FHA may need a bailout of its own
The next group in line for a government bailout could be a branch of the government itself. The Federal Housing Administration is said to be running out of money. Jeff Tyler reports on what a broke FHA would mean for the real-estate industry.
Federal Housing Administration logo (fha.gov)
More on Housing - Real Estate, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: As long as we're talking about banks and the Federal Reserve, the next group in line for a government bailout could be a branch of the government itself. The Federal Housing Administration is said to be running out of money. The FHA has been an important part of the housing market. It's been making loans long after financing from the private sector has dried up. We asked Marketplace's Jeff Tyler what a broke FHA would mean for a just recovering real-estate industry.
JEFF TYLER: The Federal Housing Administration isn't inspiring tons of confidence these days. A Washington Post story says the FHA has less money in its reserve fund than is required by law. Also, the government lender recently delayed the release of an independent audit of its finances. Budget analysts speculate FHA may need to tap Treasury funding to the tune of $20 billion. Still, some believe FHA is a good bet for a bailout.
Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
DEAN Baker: In principle, this could be made up in the future. The FHA had basically been run at a profit for most of its existence and presumably will be again once we're through this housing crisis.
When times are good, profits generated by FHA flow back to the Treasury. And FHA plays an important role in the housing market right now. Since banks have cut back on their mortgage lending, Baker says FHA has picked up the slack, now handling almost a quarter of the new mortgages being issued.
In response to FHA's financial problems, Congress may force it to adopt stricter standards.
Douglas Elliot with Brookings Institution says anything that reduces new FHA loans would be a mistake.
DOUGLAS Elliot: They are acting in a public purpose. We really want the housing market to stabilize. And if we were instead to have the FHA pull back, it would be one more thing knocking housing prices down.
FHA officials declined to comment for this story. But they will break their silence on Thursday when the FHA will release the results of the delayed independent financial audit.
I'm Jeff Tyler for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Milan, MI, 11/12/2009
Mortgage lenders' low standards--required by Congress and at least sometimes enforced by extortion by "community groups" such as ACORN--are a large part of what got us into this mess; imposing fiscal discipline is most certainly not a "mistake."
11/10/2009
People like DOUGLAS Elliot and Dean Baker are just lobbyists for housing industry.
Is there anybody guarding treasury. The current situation looks like foxes guarding the hens. They keep throwing billioins here and billions there. It has come to a point where Billion lost its meaning. Unless you start talking in trillions, billions have become chump change.
I wish I had a personal printing press for money.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.