The Climate Race
Capturing a niche in low-carbon market
China churns out solar panels, wind turbines, and more alternative energy than any other nation. It's also tops at spewing greenhouse gases, from all the coal it burns. But China sees a green lining there, too. Scott Tong reports.
Tubes in which algae is grown in carbon dioxide removed from coal at a facility outside Beijing. (Courtesy of ENN Corp.)
More on Sustainability, International, Asia, Innovation
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: President Obama spent two hours with his Chinese host in Beijing today. After meeting with President Hu Jintao, President Obama said the two countries have no choice but to work together on the big issues. Everything from nuclear proliferation to the international economy to global warming. On that subject, by the way -- global warming -- Mr. Obama said he is still expecting some kind of agreement to come out of next month's UN climate change conference in Copenhagen. When that deal is finally done, there will be much financial green to be had, as well.
So this week our series -- "The Climate Race" -- is taking a global tour of how different countries are investing in green technology right now. And China is a big one. It churns out solar panels and wind turbines. It produces more alternative energy than any other country. But it also produces more greenhouse gases than anybody else. Largely because it can't seem to get away from burning coal. But China does see a green lining there as well, as Marketplace's Scott Tong reports.
SCOTT TONG: China is industrializing fast. In the span of a single generation, hundreds of millions of people have left the farm and moved into cities. They've bought cars and electric appliances.
Ming Sung is with the international nonprofit Clean Air Task Force.
MING Sung: In the rural area, they don't have air conditioning. They don't have refrigerators or TVs. So they want to have electricity. Can we deny their comfort, that sort of things? The answer is no.
China has four times as many people as the United States. That's a lot of people demanding lots of energy. It has to come from somewhere.
Sung: China is not blessed with plenty of oil. So the only energy resource they do have within their own control is coal.
An elevator takes miners down to the coal face in Shanxi province, the West Virginia of China. It's risky work.
On the average day, 30 Chinese men contract black lung disease. Nine die in mine accidents. Yet coal is China's economic oxygen.
Retired miner Yi Yuezhi.
Yi YUEZHI: Mining definitely benefits the country. Remember the year southern China had a big snowstorm, and they lost power? Comrade Hu Jintao came here and said, "Don't rest! Keep mining coal!"
Freight trains ferry the coal across this vast country. To power the factories that export iPhones and khakis pants to a store near you. But a further, unintended export is carbon dioxide.
Energy consultant Bill Senior.
BILL Senior: In China, coal use accounts for 80 percent of their energy-related CO2 emissions. So without a solution for that, we don't have a solution for climate change.
So China is racing to develop renewable energy. Wind turbines are being installed here faster than in any other country. And China's put a much vaunted plug-in hybrid car on the market.
But the point of all this innovation isn't just saving the planet. It's to reduce China's imports of fossil fuels. China buys half its oil from overseas, and some of its coal. Thing is, it could take a generation to make alternative energy cheap and abundant. So, for now, China has to keep burning coal. It just wants to do it more cleanly and efficiently. One promising avenue is called "carbon-capture and storage."
DEBBIE Stockwell: On a single power plant it could reduce the emissions by up to 90 percent.
Debbie Stockwell, in the U.K.'s department of Energy and Climate change, helps emerging economies develop clean technologies, like carbon capture. How's it work? If you think of a coal-fired power plant as a car, carbon capture, or CCS, is like taking the tailpipe and sticking it in the ground.
Stockwell: CCS is really the only technology around at the moment that has got the potential to significantly reduce emissions from the power generation sector.
China's developing its own version. About 40 miles outside Beijing, the Chinese company ENN puts coal through a chemical process, which captures carbon dioxide in a pipe, so it's not emitted. And then, get this, the carbon's pumped into tanks of algae. We all remember plants absorb CO2, right?
The algae reproduces and, believe it or not, the slimy stuff can then be sold. ENN's Wang Yang.
Wang Yang: Algae can be crushed, and the oil can be turned into diesel, jet fuel quality. Or, it can be made into anti-aging cosmetic cream. The leftover algae can be an additive for animal feed.
Now, algae sludge is not a big seller right now. And it's certainly not the whole answer to climate change. But Ming Sung at the Clean Air Task Force says the point is there's money to be made in the clean tech race. And Chinese companies are certainly keeping pace.
Sung: They don't mind go head to head with anybody. They feel they can beat people. The Chinese enterprises: they think we can do it faster, we can do it cheaper.
Faster because China's authoritarian government can issue permits and regulations without industry lobbyists slowing things down as they do in the U.S. Cheaper because of low wages. In fact, one Chinese company's already exported its carbon-capture equipment to a power plant in Pennsylvania.
Hmm, China and exports, Energy Consultant Bill Senior has heard that before.
Senior: If carbon capture and storage becomes a global market, China could well be the manufacturing hub for much of the equipment. Just as they're manufacturing everything else that we use in our day to day lives.
Chinese jobs and patents could follow too. And for Beijing, that's a key point. As one observer put it, China lagged way behind the West in the industrial revolution. It won't let that happen this time in the green-energy revolution.
In Shanxi, northern China, I'm Scott Tong for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
12/01/2009
There are some hair-brained alternative energy concepts when it comes to mitigating climate change. That doesn't QUITE include carbon capture, but it has yet to reach the point of being commercially "promising". Full-scale CCS would involve the separation, transit, and permanent storage of gigatons of CO2 annually. Speaking of which, the method of piping fossil CO2 into algae tanks really doesn't count as "CCS". Other than the costs and challenges involved in maintaining such vessels and turning out a refined product, the "S" in CCS stands for "sequestration". But unless it's permanently disposed of, algae is simply a temporary storage medium for excess carbon. If it's by-products are burned or otherwise oxidized, that carbon ends up right back in the atmosphere as CO2, even if it does get one more cycle of use.
From Topeka, KS, 11/20/2009
In Kansas, we had such a proposed plant from Sunflower Energy to be built in Holcomb, Kansas. An area could serve several states and had partners in some of these states. The plan was to build a large coal fired electric generation facility that would capture the carbon dioxide to grow algae to be turned to diesel fuel. The residue after the extraction of the oils would be made into cattle feed consumed by an on sight cattle operation. The methane produced from the cattle operation would be used to run the diesel production operation. This plan was killed by a political appointee of our then governor. This was after approval by the Department of Health and Enviornment professionals ok'd the plan Is politcally correct enviornmental activity and unrealistic enviormentalists effecting our ability to be experimental and actually lead in alternative answers to our problems?
From Omaha, NE, 11/19/2009
I'm disappointed this story allows assumptions like "can we deny their comfort, no" and "mining definitely benefits the country" to be taken as undisputed facts. Both are opinions not facts, and with such a monstrous global problem as climate change all preconceived notions should be up for discussion.
Mr. Lovelace claims that "this is a war to increase costs", but that claim never comes with a description of who is at war. When claiming climate change is a conspiracy to increase costs, we must ask "cui bono?" Who would be perpetrating this war, and what are they supposed to gain by doing so? No specifics are ever given.
By transitioning to a clean energy economy, American workers are employed installing wind, solar, and other renewable sources of energy. Our air and water are cleaner for people all around the world. Dependence on non-renewable fossil fuels is reduced or eliminated. So who benefits from clean energy? In short, everyone.
From Milan, MI, 11/17/2009
What made the Industrial Revolution a revolution was that it dramatically decreased production costs in both resources and time simultaneously. This much-touted "green revolution" is a war to increase costs; lagging behind in it would not be an unmitigated evil.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.