Marketplace

Search

Monday, December 7, 2009

Listen to the show

TARP money could reduce the deficit

A lot of the money that was slated for TARP now is probably going to go to funding job creation. Stacey Vanek-Smith talks with Senator Judd Gregg from New Hampshire, who explains why the money would be better used paying off the national debt.

More on The Economy

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

Stacey Vanek-Smith: A lot of the money that had been slated for TARP now is probably going to go to funding job creation. Here to talk about that with us is Senator Judd Gregg from New Hampshire. He joins us live. Good morning Senator!

Judd Gregg: Good morning, how are you?

Vanek-Smith: Find thank you, how are you?

Gregg: Great.

Vanek-Smith: So tell me: What do you think about using TARP money to try to create jobs?

Gregg: Well it's against the law. The TARP, when it was created, was for the purposes of stabilizing the financial structure of this country -- which it did, and it did it in such an effective way that it's now being paid back with interest. So taxpayers are actually making money on the money that was basically put out to stabilize the financial industry. But the law has this specific language -- and I know it's specific, cause I wrote it -- that said as the money comes back in, it's to be used to reduce the deficit and the debt. Because our debt is one of our biggest problems as a nation. We're running trillions of dollars of debt -- trillion-dollar deficit, over a trillion-dollar deficit this year -- but for the next 10 years, the president's budgets are projecting trillions, a trillion-dollar on average every year. Our public debt's gone from 35 percent up to about 50 percent, it's heading towards 80 percent of GDP, maybe over 100 percent. Unsustainable situations, and that's why when we made this decision to go forward with TARP and put the $700 billion behind the financial structure to try to keep us from having a collapse, which would have lead to potentially a depression rather than a very severe recession, we made it equally clear, in a bipartisan way, that when the money started to come back in, as the banks paid down these, this TARP money that was using to stabilize them -- with interest -- that that money was to go to reduce the debt.

Vanek-Smith: How do you suggest that we address the issue of unemployment in the country -- it's at about 10 percent now, I think about 7 [million], more than 7 million people are unemployed. What's the best way to address that?

Gregg: Well, there are all sorts of ways to address that, but the government's role should be to give the small business people in this country, men and women who are out there taking risks and are the real job creators in our country, some certainty as to what their future's like. Unfortunately, with this health bill that's moving through the Congress, there's total uncertainty, there's major penalties in here for small business, major new taxes for small business. You've got this movement in the area of cap and trade, which is a massive national sales tax potentially. So you've got the business community a little concerned about what its future is and whether it's willing to make investments versus it's going to have to spend money to pay taxes. So I think the best thing the government can do is create an atmosphere for people who are willing to take risks to take risks to create jobs. Small business people want to expand their business.

Vanek-Smith: Senator Judd Gregg from New Hampshire. Senator, thank you so much.

Gregg: Thank you for your time.

Comments

  • Comment | Refresh

  • By Jeff G

    From MI, 12/08/2009

    If Senator Gregg wants to give some certainty to what the future will be like, why doesn't he play a constructive role in passing health care and climate legislation instead of being an obstructionist and kicking these problems, WHICH WILL NEED TO BE SOLVED, further down the road.

    By Joe Zen

    From San Antonio, TX, 12/08/2009

    How could other politicians even consider this free money? If I were China and I thought we were about to blow this 200b on something else, I'd quickly ask for my money back.

  • Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.

    Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.

    * indicates required field

    *
    *
    *
     




     

    You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Music From This Show

  • Whatever Gets You Through Today The Radio
  • All These Todays Just Melt Into Tomorrows Caural Buy
  • I'm Not Gonna Teach Your Boyfriend How to Dance Black Kids Buy
  • A Beautiful Mine RJD2 Buy

The Specials

VIDEO: Marketplace Minute

Marketplace Minute

Tune in every Friday for Bill Radke's poetic take on the week's news in 60 seconds

Watch the latest episode.

VIDEO: The Whiteboard

Marketplace Senior Editor Paddy Hirsch explains complex economic terms and topics so the rest of us can understand them. Watch the latest episode.

GAME: Budget Hero

Budget Hero

Think you could balance the federal budget? Play the game.

Conversations from the Corner Office

Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos.... Browse past interviews.

American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy