• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

Monday, September 10, 2007

Listen to the show

An easy-to-read label is hard to find

A nutrition label on a cereal box.

FDA officials are debating whether changes in food labels might help consumers make healthy choices. Helen Palmer reports there are plenty of ideas but not much consensus.

A nutrition label on a cereal box. (Scott Olson, Getty Images)

More on Health, Retail

TEXT OF STORY

KAI RYSSDAL: Officials at the Food and Drug Administration spent their day with the ever-expanding American waistline. The FDA's looking at food labels, debating how those labels might help consumers make healthy choices. From the Marketplace health desk at WGBH, Helen Palmer reports there are plenty of ideas but not much consensus.


Helen Palmer: The idea is to get easily recognizable, simple symbols on food to help consumers make healthy choices. There are already a bunch out there, says the FDA's Barbara Schneeman.

Barbara Schneeman: Manufacturers have developed symbols. There's some consumer groups that have developed symbols. We know that there are health organizations, like American Heart, that have also developed symbols.

The heart symbol's familiar on food packaging and menus. One supermarket chain devised a star system -- 25,000 food items rate between zero and three stars. Schneeman says these symbols are based on different nutritional criteria, like amount of fat or fiber.

Schneeman: We're also asking, Are there situations where it could confuse consumers or lead them to make a less-than-healthful food choice.

That's a problem nutritionists see with current food labeling. Tufts University's Alice Lichtenstein:

Alice Lichtenstein: And the amount of information at the moment is quite overwhelming. And for certain foods some of it is not necessarily helpful.

Lichtenstein says a simpler system would make nutrition information more accessible. Like the U.K.'s food traffic-light system. Foods with a green sticker -- go ahead; amber -- caution; red -- stop.

U.S. food companies don't want those kinds of symbols imposed. And mandatory label changes are expensive, says Robert Earl of the Grocery Manufacturers Association.

Robert Earl: In short, it costs real money. And those costs are sometimes absorbed, and sometimes are included in food costs.

Earl says food manufacturers compete to deliver healthier products. Current labels are based on the science of the government's food pyramid, and the system works well.

In Boston, I'm Helen Palmer for Marketplace.

Music From This Show

  • The Man Who Told Everything Doves
  • Pellican Narrows Caribou
  • Close My Eyes Ride
  • Fiction Reprise Belle and Sebastian
  • The Dope Dandy Warhols

The Specials

GAME: Budget Hero

Budget Hero

Think you could balance the federal budget? Play the game.

Conversations from the Corner OfficeTM

Conversations From the Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos...

Sit in

Working

Working

Intimate profiles of workers in the global economy.

Meet them

Marketplace on iTunes U

iTunes U

Marketplace is on Apple's online education platform, iTunesU. Get free downloads in subjects like History, Science, Business and more. Study up

 ©2009 American Public Media