• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

Monday, November 12, 2007

Listen to the show

A marketing battle of wants vs. needs

green santa japan

Global consumer spending has skyrocketed in the past two decades. But is advertising to blame? Do we all simply want more stuff, or do we need it for our high-speed modern lifestyles? It's a little of both, says marketing expert Kit Yarrow.

An odd collision of cultures and marketing: A "green" Santa greets childen at a promotional event for an eco-friendly line of home appliances in Japan -- where Christmas, while not a traditional holiday, has become a shopping and gift-giving event. (Junko Kimura/Getty Images)

More on Sustainability, Arts - Culture, Marketing - Advertising, Retail

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: Consumer spending has mushroomed in the past few decades. You've got to wonder why -- are marketers behind it, craftily engineering false needs? And really, what's the difference between wants and needs, anyway?

To help us unscramble the chicken from the egg, I spoke to consumer psychologist Kit Yarrow to join us. She's a professor of marketing at Golden Gate University. And I asked her what came first: desire, or marketing?

Kit Yarrow: Well, I think they're pretty evenly matched. You know, no marketer or retailer is successful in the long term if they're not satisfying real consumer needs. But at the same time, people really aren't buying clothing, for example, to stay dry when it rains. They're buying clothing to express who they are to others, feel more confident in outfits. So these needs, actually, are really closer to emotional needs or a need to connect to other people, or show people who we are.

Ryssdal: All right. But why, though, are we now using products to communicate so much?

Yarrow: You know, a couple of things: One, I think because people move so much. They don't live in the same community like they did 50 years ago. And because we're so much more global. I think the idea that people need to figure out very quickly who we are in our community and who other people are, that's part of it. And then, secondly, all of the technology at our disposal allows us, I think, to process information really quickly. And we've become really well-trained and really proficient at making use of tidbits of information, and allowing them to represent something bigger.

Ryssdal: But it does sound, just to be objective about this for a minute -- it sounds a bit superficial. It sounds almost as if you're saying we're defining ourselves by the stuff we own.

Yarrow: We are becoming a more and more superficial society. And I'm not saying that just in a negative way. You know, I think people always have had the need to connect to each other and to show people who they are and to be understood by other people. It's just that today, in our fast-paced, disconnected society, we do that through the products that we have in very quick visual ways. And what marketers have to do is to truly understand their consumers' deeper, more emotional needs -- and you can be sure they're researching that.

Ryssdal: Well, so make me hip, as it were, and tell me what the marketers are doing.

Yarrow: (Laughs) Well, you are definitely already hip, but I'll throw you a few of the things that retailers and marketers are doing, You know, one thing is to try to limit the amount of supply out there -- the perception of the amount of supply -- or to limit the amount of time somebody has to make a decision. And when consumers are in that situation, there's a little bit of fear of losing out, and consumers get a little wiggy. And you know, the use of celebrities and the association with movements -- that's another hugely emotionally appealing and oftentimes irrational aspect of purchasing.

Ryssdal: Do they work? And I'm thinking now specifically of the "green" movement as what might be the archetypical marketing ploy, right? I mean, if you want to save the planet, be green.

Yarrow: They definitely work. Consumers have a great, great need to feel like there's purpose in life, that they're connected to things that are larger than them, and so when marketers and retailers make a connection with a charity or make a connection with a movement, they give consumers two things. One, they give them a bigger sense of purpose that feels great and inspires them to buy. And two, it allows people to rationalize a purchase that they might not make were it completely rational.

Ryssdal: Kit Yarrow is a professor of psychology at marketing -- which is perfect for us -- at Golden Gate University up in San Francisco. Kit, thanks so much for your time.

Yarrow: Well, thank you so much for having me.

Consumed: Is the consumer economy sustainable?

From Marketplace...

Carpet king takes sustainable lead

Ray Anderson made his fortune manufacturing carpet. Now he's trying to convince fellow entrepreneurs to join him on a second industrial revolution and a march to "Mount Sustainability" -- this time, with a deeper shade of green.

Can Wal-Mart save the world?

Retail powerhouse Wal-Mart has been taking great pains to improve its image by adopting environmental standards across all of its stores. Kai Ryssdal talks to Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott.

Making waves of green

All Wal-Mart has to do to have an impact on green products is place an order. Reporter Sarah Gardner caught up with some of its 60,000 suppliers at a conference that the retail giant held to talk about sustainability.

From American Public Media...

The Greenwash Brigade

Bloggers test the truth of green claims.

The Consumer's Dilemma

Got an idea that could change the world? Share it!

Play Consumer Consequences

How many planets do you need for your lifestyle?

Rural Studio Road Trip

Following the Speaking of Faith across Alabama.

Music From This Show

  • In the Aeroplane Over the Sea Neutral Milk Hotel
  • Slick Chick, Sly Fly Audrey Ryan
  • La Femme d'Argent Air
  • Pastime Paradise Youngblood Brass Band
  • Whatever Lola Wants Sarah Vaughn (Gotan Project Remix)

Marketplace Confessional

"Will, you need to do a little more research into 'Buy Fresh, Buy Local' before you get on your soapbox. Eating locally and seasonally keeps more of the food dollar in the local economy. In western Minnesota, where I'm from, that is very important. Local foods will keep more people on small farms and help decrease our national dependence on petroleum. Modern corn and soybean production puts money in Monsanto, Archer Daniel Midland, and the other conglomerates pockets at the expense of local economies. Local food puts the food dollar into local farmer's and grocer's bank accounts."

 ©2009 American Public Media