Economics can predict, prevent misery
What drives an otherwise bright and ambitious young person to become an economist and subject himself to a life of deciphering regression analyses and using words like "resource allocation"? Faress Bhuiyan says, for him, it's personal.
Faress Bhuiyan (Faress Bhuiyan)
More on The Economy, Commentaries
Links
TEXT OF COMMENTARY
KAI RYSSDAL: Seeing as how it's college graduation time, we've decided to ask three future economists what ought to be a fairly simple question: Why? What drives an otherwise bright and ambitious young person to subject himself to a lifetime of deciphering regression analyses and using words like "resource allocation"?
For our second installment Faress Bhuiyan says, for him, economics is personal.
Faress Bhuiyan: Growing up in Bangladesh, I saw poverty eye to eye. The orphan children eating from a dustbin, a family of seven cramped in an 8-by-8 feet slum hut. The fate of millions in the hands of natural calamities. Widespread poverty is the most malignant cancer faced by humanity. And economics is at the forefront of researching the cure. We live in a world where we're constantly trying to balance personal free will against the reality of scarce resources. To make matters even more difficult, there's the problem of all those self-motivated agents -- also known as people. It's not easy stuff and the prescriptions offered by economists often bear a bitter taste.
So, yes, the allocation of resources in a civil society is a tricky business. Economists constantly have to engage in zero-sum games that offer benefits for some at the expense of others. Should we choose free trade to bring cheap products for local consumers but in the process expose some of our important domestic industries to extinction? Will a dollar spent on education lead to more growth than a dollar invested in infrastructure?
Trade-offs are not the most pleasant things to deal with. A world without trade-offs would be real fun. But they exist and someone has to make these important calls.
I realize that dismal predictions of what's to come, if societies follow their current trend, are a hard pill to swallow. But I strongly believe Thomas Carlyle was very short-sighted, unless he was joking, when he dubbed economics the dismal science. Economics predicts and tries to prevent the escalation of misery. If a poor, rural woman in Bangladesh can use micro-credit to become a businesswoman overnight, and if the East Asian tigers can tackle poverty with miraculous growth over the last 60 years, then surely it's not a bad idea to find the reason behind these success stories.
RYSSDAL: Faress Bhuiyan is a doctoral candidate in economics at Northwestern University.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Dhaka, Bangladesh, 05/22/2008
Nice and realistic talk Dr. Bhuiyan. I agree with everything you said. Congratulations !!
From carlsbad, CA, 05/22/2008
this was an outstanding essay that put a number of issues into a new perspective for me. mr. bhuiyan's writing demonstrates a balance between realism and optimism. npr consistantly showcases talented people and relevant topics. congratulations.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.