Marketplace

Search

Monday, June 2, 2008

Listen to the show

U.S. loses final appeal in cotton dispute

cotton in hands

The World Trade Organization has ruled in favor of Brazil in a six-year trade dispute over U.S. cotton subsidies. Dan Grech explains what the ruling means for U.S. growers.

A worker holds cotton in his hands. (Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

More on The Economy

TEXT OF STORY

Bob Moon : The U.S. government has long been weaving a safety net for cotton farmers. They get a federal subsidy if world cotton prices get too low.

Enter Brazil, which complains the subsidies are unfair. Six years ago, it took the case to the World Trade Organization, and today, the U.S. lost its final appeal. That means Brazil can retaliate with tariffs if the U.S. doesn't change its cotton subsidy program.

From the Americas Desk at WLRN, Marketplace's Dan Grech has more.


Dan Grech: Today's WTO ruling opens the door for Brazil to impose so-called "retaliatory trade sanctions." Basically, that means Brazil could punish unrelated U.S. industries until the U.S. amends its cotton subsidy program.

Economist Bruce Babcock is with Iowa State University. He says Brazil may have several U.S. firms in its crosshairs.

Bruce Babcock: Probably the most important would be the drug companies. Following that would be some seed companies like Monsanto and DuPont.

Retaliatory tariffs from Brazil could cost the U.S. firms upwards of $1 billion a year.

The WTO has consistently ruled that U.S. cotton subsidies encourage U.S. cotton overproduction. That depresses world prices.

With today's ruling, the U.S. has no avenues left for appeal. The Bush administration says it will continue to defend the subsidy program.

Sean Spicer is with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative:

Sean Spicer: We have tremendous respect for the WTO, but we don't just roll over, especially in this particular case where we believe we're right.

He says the WTO ruling is irrelevant. World cotton prices are too high for subsidies to kick in.

Bruce Babcock says the U.S. should comply with the ruling because it needs a strong WTO.

Babcock: We depend a whole lot on trade and the more free and open the trade there is, the more in aggregate that the United States wins.

But cotton subsidies may be here to stay: Congress just passed a farm bill that extends them for five years.

I'm Dan Grech for Marketplace.

Comments

  • Comment | Refresh

  • Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.

    Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.

    * indicates required field

    *
    *
    *
     




     

    You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Music From This Show

  • You'll Disappear The Phenomenal Handclap Band
  • Leave Them All Behind Ride Buy
  • Parisian Glam Slam Shawn Lee's Ping Pong Orchestra Buy
  • Burning The Whitest Boy Alive Buy
  • Uprising Antibalas Afrobeat Orchestra Buy

The Specials

GAME: Budget Hero

Budget Hero

Think you could balance the federal budget? Play the game.

Conversations from the Corner OfficeTM

Conversations From the Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos...

Sit in

Working

Working

Intimate profiles of workers in the global economy.

Meet them

Marketplace on iTunes U

iTunes U

Marketplace is on Apple's online education platform, iTunesU. Get free downloads in subjects like History, Science, Business and more. Study up

American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy