U.S. food aid policy isn't helping
The U.S. is the world's largest food donor, but because the food needs to come from U.S. suppliers and transport, a great deal of the aid ends up wasted. Sam Eaton reports some are calling for White House reforms.
Food and water is distributed to Iraqis. (Ian Waldie/Getty Images)
More on Charity - Giving
TEXT OF STORY
Renita Jablonski: Talk about a looming global food shortage is a big part of this week's G8. Leaders of the world's wealthiest nations are meeting in Japan this week. They're promising more money for food aid. But as rising costs dissolve global relief budgets, some are calling for changes in the way that food aid is delivered. Their first target is the famed U.S. program "Food for Peace." From the Marketplace Sustainability Desk, Sam Eaton reports.
Sam Eaton: At a refugee camp in northern Kenya, men sing as they unload white sacks of grain imprinted with the American flag. This dusty food distribution point is the final stop in a six-month journey from the American heartland -- a journey many consider to be the crowning example of U.S. good will.
But John Hoddinott with International Food Policy Research Institute sees it as a missed opportunity:
John Hoddinott: It's extraordinarily striking how clumsy and inefficient the American system is.
Hoddinott says special interests, not goodwill, are the main drivers of U.S. food aid. The U.S. is the world's largest food donor, with contributions exceeding a billion dollars a year. But there's a catch: all of that food must be purchased from U.S. suppliers and shipped on U.S.-flagged carriers. That means in times of crisis, food can take up to six months to reach recipients. And the cost of shipping on U.S. carriers is the highest in the world. So:
Hoddinott: Only about 40 percent of U.S. food aid actually goes on food.
All this has prompted calls for reform from the White House. They recently proposed funding food purchases closer to where crises occur. That protects local markets and buys more food for the money.
But Paul Green, with the North American Millers' Association, says the plan would backfire:
Paul Green: The real fear here is that we might see an unexpected and unintended outcome of far less resources rather than far more.
Green, whose members include agricultural giants ConAgra and Archer Daniels Midland, says cutting U.S. farmers out of the deal would also eliminate the food aid program's biggest supporters.
Green: I dare say that without a constituency from the agriculture community, the chances of getting those appropriations would fairly disappear.
That argument has left U.S. food aid policy virtually unchanged for decades. But the International Food Policy Research Institute's John Hoddinott says everything else has changed. Rising food prices are swelling the ranks of the hungry and crippling the budgets of relief programs. He says every dollar wasted on keeping special interests happy is the difference between a meal and starvation for the world's poorest.
I'm Sam Eaton for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Brisbane, Qld, Australia, 03/21/2009
There are other private organisations busy donating food to starving people also. I am working with one private comapany that does a great job at working with 3rd party distribution organisations to distribute food aid to starving children. The needs of starvation victims are different for children on the brink of clinical starvation, they can not assimalate ordinary food and need a special diet to bring them back onto solid food. This company provides such a meal pack product that is donated by their network of private independant distributors. Read the full review at www.compare-xango-review.wholesomehamper.com
From Brisbane, Qld, Australia, 03/20/2009
There 852 Million starving people around the world. Surely, if delivery takes six months then a local agricultural development solution should become a viable option. Worldvision promote donation of agricultural development packages containing tools and seed for the production of vegetables for local villages in areas affected by Starvation. If the USA Agricultural movement can not meet requirement effecitively then why not shift the program to the supply of agricultural tools and seeds and teach these people how to grow there own food. A Safe Clean Water Generation program would go hand in hand with an Agricultural Development program. The technology exists to draw water from the atmosphere, surely the Great and Powerful US of A can get it's sh*t together for such a worthy cause.
From Bangalore, 07/09/2008
The appplication of GIS (Geographic Information System) will develop information base in identifying the locations suffering from hunger. Food logistics needs to be developed that shall help in optimum consumption of food being grown in the world. It is also worth at this point to debate if food had to be grown in US and at what cost?
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.