Marketplace

Search

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Listen to the show

Bill proposes FDA oversight of tobacco

An open cigarette cartridge and lit cigarette

A bill that would give the FDA power to regulate tobacco products cleared the House and will be taken up by the Senate in the fall. What would the measure mean for the tobacco industry? Steve Henn reports.

An open pack of cigarettes and an ash tray. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

More on Health

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: Marlboro meet Benson and Hedges. Philip Morris International announced today that it's buying Rothman's, the Canadian cigarette maker, for about $2 billion. That'll give the company about a third of the Canadian tobacco market.

The U.S. market, meanwhile, could be in for some changes. The House of Representative passed a bill that would let the Food and Drug Administration regulate tobacco for the first time.

It's not a done deal yet -- still has to pass the Senate -- but some in the industry say say it actually stacks the deck in favor of Philip Morris USA. That's this country's biggest tobacco company.

From Washington, Marketplace's Steve Henn explains.


Steve Henn: If you have a fondness for flavored cigarettes, yesterday's vote on the tobacco bill was bad news.

Matthew Myers: It bans clove cigarettes because clove cigarettes appeal to young people. It bans other flavorings because they appeal to young people.

Matthew Myers heads the campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. He says flavors are one way tobacco companies lure new smokers. Every day, more than 1,000 kids pick up the habit and each year roughly 400,000 Americans die.

The bill gives the FDA authority to see secret recipes and demand changes like cutting nicotine and banning menthol. Myers says the goal is to make it harder to get hooked, easier to quit and maybe even lead to a less dangerous cigarette, though no one knows if that's possible.

R.J. Reynolds lobbied against this bill -- some of its most popular brands are menthols and lights. Steve Kottak, a Reynolds executive, says informed adults should be allowed to make their own decisions.

Steve Kottak: We believe there is a need for public health policies that are broader than the abstinence-only, one-size-fits-all approach embodied in this bill.

But Myers says he had one surprising ally: Philip Morris, which is betting...

Myers: That in that highly regulated market, it will gain a competitive advantage. What we care about is that we believe the legislation will save lives.

Competitors feel the bill's advertising ban means Philip Morris will simply lock in its market dominance.

In Washington, I'm Steve Henn for Marketplace.

Comments

  • Comment | Refresh

  • By j peters

    08/01/2008

    There is alreagy a "less dangerous cigarette." Its called marijuana.

    By wald athane

    From palmdale, CA, 08/01/2008

    Not only is this bill un-american anti choice but it is racist.
    Please give me a break cloves and flavors are not getting younger smokers they cannot afford the luxury tax. Most young smokers i know smoke Philip Morris.
    don't give Phil more power.

    By Tom Shillock

    08/01/2008

    The FDA's raison d'etre to make sure the food and drugs we consume are safe not to give a government seal of healthiness to products made from a known carcinogin. This legislative joke is the act of a conflicted and irresponsible government that is addicted to big tobacco's taxes more than it is committed to the public's health. The settlement between tobacco companies and states attorneys general a few years ago gave big tobacco partners not adversaries. One can imagine two warnings on packages of cigarettes: one saying it causes cancer, the other saying it's approved by the FDA! In any case, big pharma, biotech and the healthcare industry will support any legislation that doesn't ban tobacco because they make a fortune selling their bogus cancer therapies. What a world.

    By Irving 143

    07/31/2008

    Big Tobacco has been in retreat for some time, but now it sounds like it's got the US legislature helping it retrench.

    By Andrew Craig

    07/31/2008

    The government needs to get its hands off companies. Please, no more regulation.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a smoker. I don't own any tobacco companies stocks nor work for any tobacco companies.

  • Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.

    Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.

    * indicates required field

    *
    *
    *
     




     

    You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Music From This Show

  • Salt Trucks Great Lakes Myth Society Buy
  • Think About It The Lions
  • Just a Little Heat Black Keys Buy
  • God Has a Voice, She Speaks Through Me CocoRosie Buy
  • Casimir Pulaski Day Sufjan Stevens Buy

The Specials

GAME: Budget Hero

Budget Hero

Think you could balance the federal budget? Play the game.

Conversations from the Corner OfficeTM

Conversations From the Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos...

Sit in

Working

Working

Intimate profiles of workers in the global economy.

Meet them

Marketplace on iTunes U

iTunes U

Marketplace is on Apple's online education platform, iTunesU. Get free downloads in subjects like History, Science, Business and more. Study up

American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy