Teen finds sushi fraud using DNA tests
Recent high school grad Kate Stoeckle and her friend Louisa Strauss made headlines by finding something fishy on their sushi plates. Kai Ryssdal talks to the Manhattan teen.
Kate Stoeckle who discovered fake sushi using DNA. (Mark Stoeckle)
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: There are plenty of people out there who'll tell you that in this digital age newspapers aren't good for much of anything except fish-wrap. But then you run across a story about actual fish. Today's New York Times has the tale of a couple of high school students in Manhattan who got curious about their sushi and whether they were actually getting the delicacies they had ordered. Katie Stoeckle took a lead from her scientist dad. She tried something called DNA barcoding, a way to genetically identify a species of, say, fish, that's simpler than sequencing the whole genome.
Kate, good to talk to you.
Kate Stoeckle Hi, good to talk to you too.
Ryssdal: Listen, not every high schooler decides to DNA test their sushi. Where'd this idea come from?
Stoeckle: Well, my dad has been involved in barcoding for a long time, so I've sort of grown up listening to dinner table conversations about barcoding. It's always been on my mind, and my friends and I love to go eat sushi. So we were wondering if you could apply the DNA barcoding technology to find out what fish we're eating.
Ryssdal: So, what exactly did you do?
Stoeckle: We would go to different restaurants and stores in New York City. We bought fish and we snipped off a tiny little snippet of the sample. We stored them in alcohol vials. And then we sent them to a lab in Canada where they sequenced the DNA for us. And then, when we got the results back, we found that a quarter of the samples were mislabeled.
Ryssdal: What were some of the most egregious examples you found of this mislabeling?
Stoeckle: Yeah. There were nine samples labeled as red snapper, and seven of them were not. And among those seven, one was actually the endangered species Acadian redfish.
Ryssdal: Ooh, that's not good. And what about the tuna example you found?
Stoeckle: Yeah. There was a, it was labeled as while tuna and it was actually Mozambique tilapia, which is sort of a cheap farmed fish.
Ryssdal: There was a little element of caveat emptor here. I mean, in a place as crazy for sushi as New York City, people are out there getting tilapia instead of tuna.
Stoeckle: I know. You know, and I think one of the important things about this is consumers really should be getting what they pay for. So it's sort of like when people sell fake designer labels. You're paying the money for a brand, you should be getting that quality.
Ryssdal: How much sushi did you buy actually for this experiment?
Stoeckle: We bought about, I think, it was $300 worth of fish.
Ryssdal: Did you guys spend your own your money, or did you spend Dad's money?
Stoeckle: Yeah, mostly it was our hard-earned money, so. [Kai laughs] But it was over a long period of time.
Ryssdal: Now, I understand that you're not interested in revealing exactly which restaurants are mislabeling their product for fear of lawsuits.
Stoeckle: Right.
Ryssdal: But did you tell the restaurants that they were mislabeling?
Stoeckle: No, we haven't spoken to them. You know, we're not even sure that the restaurants themselves are aware that they are selling mislabeled fish. So, we don't know where the mislabeling occurs. It's probably not the fishermen. And it may not even be the restaurants. So, we're not sure yet.
Ryssdal: Any inquiries from the New York City Department of Health, or any of those guys. Consumer Affairs? Has the mayor call you?
Stoeckle: No, not yet. [laughs]
Ryssdal: All right, so this is a big science coup for you. You're on the front page of the New York Times. Are you gonna be a scientist when you go off to school this fall, to college?
Stoeckle: You know, I'm not planning on it just yet. I think that's another interesting about the project is that I'm not a typical science student. You know, I'm interested in science, but I also like writing and psychology. So, you know, if someone like me can get involved in a project like this, it shows that other people can do it too It's not just for the strictly science student.
Ryssdal: Kate Stoeckle and her science experiment in New York City. Thank you, Kate.
Stoeckle: Thank you.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Myrtle Beach, SC, 08/25/2008
great story, and great info from these kids...
thanks for doing this story as it helps to justify those of us wanting 'what you pay for is what you get'
as being in the fish biz
I will be doing RFID tags on our fish out of Centroamerica this year, will help to establish time date and data info on each fish brought to the consumer
as eating any kind of fish, [mercury lies,fables etc]
is better than NOT eating fish
Do you like eating anything you can outrun? ....not me
as Bubba Johnson say's "eat mo' fish"
www.senorpescado.com
and fairtradefish.org
From Champaign, IL, 08/25/2008
I love most of the stories I hear on Marketplace...
...at least as much as I love sushi.
This may be my favorite story of all-time. As a molecular biology major, I have huge respect for Kate's ingenuity and dedication -- and the kind of creative naïveté that's driven some of the greatest scientific achievements.
The scientific community needs people like her. She's the modern version of the old-school scientist, and follows a model I've personally tried to emulate throughout my educational career.
As a psychology double major and someone about to apply to med school, I can say that both disciplines also need people like her. That kind of questioning mind and aggressive approach could be put to use in so many ways. I hope she goes into a field - any field - where her talents can be put to good use.
From Champaign, IL, 08/25/2008
I love most of the stories I hear on Marketplace...
...at least as much as I love sushi.
This may be my favorite story of all-time. As a molecular biology major, I have huge respect for Kate's ingenuity and dedication -- and the kind of creative naïveté that's driven some of the greatest scientific achievements.
The scientific community needs people like her. She's the modern version of the old-school scientist, and follows a model I've personally tried to emulate throughout my educational career.
As a psychology double major and someone about to apply to med school, I can say that both disciplines also need people like her. That kind of questioning mind and aggressive approach could be put to use in so many ways. I hope she goes into a field - any field - where her talents can be put to good use.
08/22/2008
Please forward story
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.