Our sharp listeners get to the point
Kai Ryssdal reviews letters from our listeners about acupuncture, Social Security's disability benefits, David Frum's take on immigration policy, and the correct way to pronounce "nuclear."
Letters in a computer with red mailbox flag (iStockPhoto)
TEXT OF LETTERS
KAI RYSSDAL: One of the our most-commented-upon stories of the past few weeks came from the world of medicine -- ancient Chinese medicine, to be exact. We told you about a community acupuncture clinic in Philadelphia. Group sessions there are making the alternative treatment more affordable.
But Patrick Pierce from San Diego, Calif., wasn't worried about the economics. He just didn't care much for the idea of acupuncture at all.
PATRICK PIERCE: I noticed that the subject of whether acupuncture is truly medically effective was not addressed. Perhaps you should do more stories on pseudoscience, quackery, and fraud medicine and the dangers they can pose both directly from injury and indirectly by convincing people to not see a credible doctor and properly treat their conditions.
That struck a nerve in the comments section of our website.
Pennsylvania graduate student Melanie Adley says that after a long day of slogging over her German homework acupuncture works great on her stress.
MELANIE ADLEY: For those who do yoga, it's like a very good yoga session. You feel totally calm and a little energetic and I felt totally sharp which is not meant to be a pun.
Another story from the health world caught listeners' ears, too. We looked at the backlog of Social Security disability claims. Social worker Emily Axel from Astoria, N.Y., liked the piece but she thought we left some people out of it.
EMILY AXEL: One important aspect that was not mentioned in your story, however, are the individuals who apply for disability based on a mental health disorder. These applications are most certainly considered "borderline," and often incredibly difficult to have approved by administrative judges.
This fall's campaign was in the air over the past few weeks as both parties held their nominating conventions. We asked some of our commentators to tell us what the candidates weren't talking about but should be.
David Frum's take on immigration really steamed English language teacher Rene Kreisel.
Rene Kreisel: His idea to implement an immigration policy like Canada's or Australia's, which favor highly-skilled individuals, in the end treats people like things. As a wealthy nation, where even the poor are rich in comparison to the world's poorest, our immigration policy should be primarily humanitarian.
Commentator Will Marshall got a lot of letters too. Not for what he said about energy policy, but for how he said it.
WILL MARSHALL: But there's a missing element in the party's platform, and that's any discussion of the future of nuclear energy. In fact, nuclear power doesn't rate a single mention in 57 pages.
New-cu-lar . . . sound familiar?
PRESIDENT BUSH: Newculer weapons.
Not that this makes it right, but George Bush, Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Dwight Eisenhower have all pronounced nuclear, at times, as new-cu-lar.
Maybe this does make it right, though. Merriam Webster recognizes both pronunciations. They'll send you a long explanation of why, if you ask.






Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Atascadero, CA, 09/09/2008
Thank you, Kai Rysdall, for airing what I've been yelling in my car for years. Mr. President, it's pronounced new-cle-ur, not newculur. My own son knows how to pronounce it. One time, my son heard him having his newculur moment and said something profound, "I don't know why he says newculur when the root word is nucleus which everyone knows is not pronounced newculus." The irony is that President Bush supports newculur power as a viable alternative energy solution.
From Salt Lake City, UT, 09/09/2008
Merriam-Webster needs to recognize that earning a degree rarely depends on the ability to relieve oneself of an endowed pronunciation impediment. The litany of "educated speakers" that use "nucular" are just plain wrong and any argument otherwise cheapens the rules of language.
From Houston, TX, 09/09/2008
On the pronunciation of "nuclear" in Merrian-Webster:
Although usage and change is natural for a "living language", I don't agree with this one because it's not a choice to pronounce "nucuelar" at this time - it's an impairment. I've never met anyone who simply chooses to say it this way - they do it because it's the only way they can! It's just a tongue-twister to some people - but that can't count as a variation.
I checked that the pronunciation for "ask" lists "aks" as a "dialect".
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.