Foreign banks may be in bailout line too
Treasury Secretary Paulson wants the bailout to be open to all banks with "significant" operations in the United States. That could mean American taxpayers may wind up bailing out more foreign banks than American ones. Stephen Beard reports.
An HSBC bank branch (Getty Images)
More on The Economy, International, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
KAI RYSSDAL: Secretary Paulson wants the bailout to be open to all banks with what he calls "significant operations in the United States." Regardless of who owns them. But that might not play too well in Congress. From the European Desk in London, Stephen Beard explains American taxpayers may wind up bailing out more foreign banks than American ones.
STEPHEN BEARD: Foreign banks have been among the biggest casualties of the subprime debacle. UBS of Switzerland alone has already written off more than $40 billion in toxic assets.
Peter Hann is a former American investment banker and now a lecturer at the Cass Business School in London. He can understand why American taxpayers may not want to bail out foreign banks.
PETER HANN: The Royal Bank of Scotland, the Union Bank of Switzerland or Credit Agricole, they took risks like everybody else. They're big, sophisticated organizations. Why should the U.S. taxpayer support their shareholders?
Nevertheless, Hann supports the global reach of the bailout. He says that as the dominant force in the global economy, the U.S. had to take a broad approach.
Economist Andrew Hilton agrees, but says U.S. taxpayers shouldn't -- and won't -- shoulder the whole burden.
ANDREW HILTON: Other governments will be forced to do something similar, perhaps not on such a grand scale. But something similar.
No foreign government has stepped up to the plate so far. But, says Peter Hann, they could be induced to do so. Paulson could insist on the U.S. getting a large equity stake in all the foreign banks that it bails out.
HANN: Certain foreign governments might not like Paulson's bank to own a major share, and that might encourage them to contribute to the process and buy the securities themselves rather than let Paulson's bank do it.
Hann says the condition of an equity stake might even make the Paulson plan more palatable to the beleaguered American taxpayers.
In London, this is Stephen Beard for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Elgin, TX, 09/23/2008
Wouldn't it be really ironic if UBS received taxpayer money as part of the bailout? I mean isn't this the same UBS that was one of the banks being studied by the Senate for offering offshore tax shelters that kept the federal government from receiving 100 billion dollars per year? (http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/09/22/pm_foreign_banks/)
So, let me make sure I get this right: they help people NOT pay their taxes. Then, those of us who do pay all of our taxes, give them money to help them stay in business? Sounds like a good deal to me.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.