Marketplace

Search

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Listen to the show

Congressman: Bill prevents calamity

Congressman John Campbell

Republican Congressman John Campbell voted yes for the $700 billion rescue plan the first time around and tells Kai Ryssdal that he intends to do so again when it comes back to the House floor.

Republican Congressman John Campbell of California (campbell.house.gov)

More on The Economy, Wall Street, Politics, America's Financial Crisis

Links

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

Kai Ryssdal: California Republican John Campbell sits on the House Financial Services Committee. He voted yes on the original proposal on Monday. Congressman, welcome to the program.

John Campbell: Good to be with you, Kai.

Ryssdal: We're gonna get to tomorrow's vote in a second, but I want to back up to earlier this week and ask you, what the heck happened on Monday that this bill failed.

Campbell: This bill has been characterized in all media everywhere as a $700 billion bailout of Wall Street. It's not and I'm happy to explain later, if you want, why I believe it's none of those things, but as a result, the public believed that's what it is, and they were calling offices and telling people in huge numbers, including my office, to vote against it. And then in the end, I think, both the Democratic and Republican leadership didn't quite get it right, 'cause they're not supposed to put a bill on the floor that they want to pass, unless they know they have the votes to pass it.

Ryssdal: As you know, the markets are doing so well today, Congressman. Do you think maybe Wall Street and the wider credit markets don't believe you guys are gonna get it done tomorrow?

Campbell: I actually don't think that's what's going on today. I actually think the markets probably have more confidence that it's going to pass tomorrow than I do right now. What I think you're seeing is, even if this bill passes and even if this bill works, the economy is bad. What the bill, if it works, if it works, is prevent calamity. I mean, it prevents a complete rapid meltdown, but even with the bill and if it works, we're still likely to see an orderly drop into recession and the after effects of this credit crunch that's going on. I mean, you're hearing about it everywhere. Car loans being super expensive and drying up. Loans for solid businesses drying up. All those shocks are going to continue to be negative impacts on overall economic activity.

Ryssdal: Well, let me "what if" this thing for you for a second here, Congressman. If all of these bad things are going to happen, kind of whether this bill works or doesn't, what's the influence on lawmakers tomorrow to vote for the bill.

Campbell: Well because if we don't vote for it, these credit markets could melt down and accelerate to the point where people go to the bank and can't get their money out, you know, people can't get their money out of a money market fund. Those are all impacts that could be extremely, extremely negative if we do nothing. If we do pass it and it does work, things still won't be great but we won't have that kind of calamity.

Ryssdal: I don't want to get in hot water with your party leadership, here, Congressman, but you did say that they didn't get it right on Monday. What did they have to do, the speaker and Congressman Boehner, to get enough votes tomorrow to get this thing to pass?

Campbell: I think people, first of all, have to be convinced of how dire the need is and how severe the problem is. And if it doesn't pass, then all these bad things that others are predicting happen, how's it going to be for you then? You know, when you go back home and then people say, hey, why didn't you do anything to prevent this from happening? So, I think there's a little bit of that, and I think there's a little more confidence that needs to be built up for some people that the $700 billion, it will not be spent, it will be invested in buying assets. And there's actually three different layers of security to make sure that the taxpayer gets all of it back and may, in fact, make a profit. And I think that's the misconception that's out there. The $700 billion will not be spent.

Ryssdal: Do you feel good about this vote, you personally?

Campbell: Nobody feels good about this bill, I mean nobody wants to do this. Again, Republican or Democrat. But I feel extremely confident, I'm not sure I've ever been as sure of many votes that I've made here as I do that the yes vote on this bill is the right vote. Not one I love to make but that it's the right vote and the best thing under the circumstances, not just for my constituents, I mean, for the country and arguably the world.

Ryssdal: Representative John Campbell, Republican of California. Congressman, thanks a lot for your time.

Campbell: Thank you, Kai. Good to be with you.

Comments

  • Comment | Refresh

  • By Jacob Lee

    From Tustin, CA, 10/07/2008

    Vote No on John Campbell in November. He voted against the people he represents. Even the democrats that are elected in Orange County no better than to vote for this bill.

    Send John Campbell Home come November

    By Bhupen Khanolkar

    10/03/2008

    This Bailout (Rescue) Bill is going to further depress real wages as it will add to further inflation. It is not going to solve the housing crisis which is at the core of this credit squeeze, because banks are simply going to hoard the money they get by selling the worst of the worst of these assets to the tax payers. It is not going to solve the confidence issue that will allow banks to starting lending to each other again. It will only add to more M&A activity and more pricing inflation because of the lack of competition.

    The congressman does not know he is talking about. This bill will completely destroy the economy and the standard of living for middle class Americans.

    I don’t know why Obama is supporting this bill. This is nonsense.

    IT IS LOADED WITH PORK.

    By Bhupen Khanolkar

    10/03/2008

    This Bailout (Rescue) Bill is going to further depress real wages as it will add to further inflation. It is not going to solve the housing crisis which is at the core of this credit squeeze, because banks are simply going to hoard the money they get by selling the worst of the worst of these assets to the tax payers. It is not going to solve the confidence issue that will allow banks to starting lending to each other again. It will only add to more M&A activity and more pricing inflation because of the lack of competition.

    The congressman does not know he is talking about. This bill will completely destroy the economy and the standard of living for middle class Americans.

    I don’t know why Obama is supporting this bill. This is nonsense.

    IT IS LOADED WITH PORK.

  • Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.

    Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.

    * indicates required field

    *
    *
    *
     




     

    You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Music From This Show

  • Silver Dollar Tommy McCook and the Skataliites Buy
  • M79 Vampire Weekend Buy
  • How Long Do I Have to Wait for You? Sharon Jones Buy
  • Boy with a Coin Iron & Wine Buy
  • Can't Be Still Booker T & the MGs Buy
Podcast »

Listen to 'After the Bell'

In his weekly podcast, Scott Jagow makes sense of the week in business and the economy. Subscribe now.

The Whiteboard »

Derivatives

Whiteboard DerivativesWatch the video

Credit default swaps? They're complicated -- and scary! The receipt you get when you pre-order your Thanksgiving turkey? Not so much. But they have a lot in common: They're both derivatives. Senior Editor Paddy Hirsch explains. Watch the video.

More Whiteboard Videos »

Getting Personal »
Chris Farrell

Q: Another credit report

I have been requesting credit reports in tandem from one of the three agencies every fourth month. In this way, I receive a free report from each agency once a year. Would I jeopardize the free report privilege if my wife requested separate credit reports as well? Robert, Raleigh, NC Read Chris Farrell's answer »

Special Reports and Series

Built on Belief »

One year after the fall of Lehman Brothers, Americans' have lost faith in the financial system and learned some hard lessons. Get more.

The Big Shift »

The recession has changed our financial lives. A look at wealth and prosperity in the middle class and how we live now. Get more.

The Borrowers »

How living beyond our means helped bring down the economy. The role of personal debt in the financial crisis, and where we go from here. Get more.

The Next American Dream »

How four pillars of the American Dream are changing. What's in your future?

Taking Stock »

Conversations with individuals who can give us the long view of our economic situation. Get their views.

More Stories & Special Reports »

The Specials

GAME: Budget Hero

Budget Hero

Think you could balance the federal budget? Play the game.

Conversations from the Corner OfficeTM

Conversations From the Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos...

Sit in

Working

Working

Intimate profiles of workers in the global economy.

Meet them

Marketplace on iTunes U

iTunes U

Marketplace is on Apple's online education platform, iTunesU. Get free downloads in subjects like History, Science, Business and more. Study up

American Public Media © |   Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Policy