$300 million for homeowners in trouble
Hope for Housing, is a new $300 million program to help homeowners facing foreclosure get new loans. It was part of the Fannie Mae-Freddie Mack deal. Stacey Vanek-Smith talks to some who want to see more.
Logo for the Hope for Housing program (hopeforhousing.org)
More on The Economy, Housing - Real Estate, Wall Street, Politics, America's Financial Crisis
Links
- The Hope for Housing Web site
The Hope for Housing Web site
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: One of the big complaints about Henry Paulson's original rescue plan and about the version that failed in the House on Monday and about the version that's on its way to the House tomorrow is that none of them does enough to help individuals with mortgages they can't afford anymore. Since the whole worldwide economic brouhaha we find ourselves in started with Americans not being able to make their mortgage payments, that's kind of a big deal.
Yesterday, Washington launched a program called Hope for Homeowners. It's supposed to help mortgage holders who are in trouble. But Marketplace's Stacey Vanek-Smith reports a wider solution might take more than just hope.
Stacey Vanek-Smith: Lisa Monrone is three months behind on her mortgage payments. The sociology teacher from Greeley Colorado had been covering them with her home equity line of credit. Then the bank cut that off.
Lisa Monrone: My value went way down, because there are so many foreclosures in this area.
Monrone says her lender started working with her. It lowered her interest rates, which lowered her payments. That kind of private sector cooperation is exactly what the government is counting on to help stabilize the housing market, says Georgetown Law's Adam Levitin. But, he says, lenders aren't always willing to take a hit.
Adam Levitin: Unfortunately, servicers often find foreclosure more profitable for themselves than modification.
Levitin says modifying loans is expensive, but if a home goes into foreclosure, servicers can collect huge fees and get paid first when the home is sold. Levitin says that's the problem with the government's Hope for Homeowners plan. It won't offer real relief because it's voluntary for lenders. Levitin says Congress' bailout bill needs to help homeowners, not just stabilize financial markets.
But Nick Retsinas, director of Harvard's Joint Center for housing studies, says stabilizing financial markets, will help homeowners.
Nick Retsinas In the long run, if we can stabilize our economy, that will stabilize the housing market.
But the clock is ticking, says Levitin.
Levitin: We have a foreclosure machine that is grinding up 6,000 families a day.
Levitin says Lawmakers should modify bankruptcy laws, so homeowners could renegotiate mortgages when they filed for bankruptcy. He says that would help people make their payments and the financial markets could start humming again.
I'm Stacey Vanek-Smith for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Macomb, MI, 10/03/2008
I think the answer to the housing crisis is fairly straight forward. Have the government guarantee that anyone with an ARM can get a 30 year conventional mortgage at a competitive rate. If you can afford the payments, Great! You can now stay in your house. If not, you are in more house than you can afford and, sorry, time to downsize. Pretty simple.
10/02/2008
Lynn, I agree with you. No sense of getting that fixed rate mortgage. No sense of buying house that you can afford. No sense of being responsible to what you sign. Just take an ARM loan. Buy a big house. Don't worry about 'what if I lose a job' thought. Just fall behind payment, and cry out for help. No sense of being RESPONSIBLE anymore.
From Muskegon, MI, 10/02/2008
After listening to all these stories of failed banks, mortgage companies, homeowners, etc. and the need to bail all of these entities out, I wonder where the reward for doing the right thing comes into play. For those of us that chose to make a resonable home choice and have made our payments. Seems to me we are rewarding bad choices and sometimes outright greed and irresponsiblity on the backs of people who made more responsible chooses and are making their payments, pushing them into more trouble, throwing good money afetr bad and sinking even more people. Not sure what the answer is. Maybe give that 75B to the American adults to spend and save after all we are the ones that truly move the economy all of those industies are simply the tools used to do that. If Americans can't spend and save nothing moves. Thank you for listening
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.