Britain has a brand new bailout
Today Britain has unveiled a bailout package which would buy up billions worth of preferred stock in eight British banks. Renita Jablonski talks to David Buick of BGC Partners about how it would work.
City workers walk through London's Canary Wharf (Shaun Curry/AFP/Getty Images)
More on International, Europe, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF INTERVIEW
Stacey Vanek-Smith: Good to have you with us as we continue with Fallout, our coverage of the financial crisis. The $700 billion bailout bill has dominated news in this country. Today, Britain has unveiled an enormous bailout package of its own. The U.K. will buy up as much as $88 billion worth of preferred stock in eight British banks, and make $350 billion more dollars available to banks.
David Buick is a partner at BGC. David, how would this work?
David Buick: Well, the way it would work, for an old capitalist like me, is a horror story to be honest with you. Because in the circumstances, it's not a bad deal. In the long term, I think it will be greeted with a certain amount of cynicism. Because when something is nationalized, it restricts the management in its business plan. And also it dilutes the equity of its existing shareholders, who have seen catastrophic losses on their shares during the course of the last year and a half. And they're not very happy to have seen what's happened in the last two or three days.
Vanek-Smith: Well I wanted to ask you about that, because the markets have not reacted all that well to the plans -- it doesn't seem to have helped that much.
Buick: Yeah, but we're late out of the starting gate. Because the U.S. government had no contingency plan after Bear Stearns, to shore this up in a really -- I mean this was obviously going to be a horrific problem. And everybody behaved like ostriches -- stuck their head in the sand saying "This is a bad dream, it's going away." And it never was. And that's my issue with the U.K. government, they did the same. They stuck their head in the sand, "It's nothing to do with me, mate." It is -- it's to do with everybody. And it's the abrogation of taking responsibly immediately is what's exacerbated this problem on a global basis.
Vanek-Smith: Do you think we're going to have to see sort of more sweeping action from central banks?
Buick: I think the central banks are absolutely key in the next six months. We need them for liquidity, not for solvency. Some of these banks are in quite good shape, funnily enough. It's just the fact is because this system is shot to ribbons that they can't raise deposits, because everybody's clean out of confidence, clean out of trust. You get the confidence and the trust restored and the show will be back on the road, absolutely like a, you know, rocket.
Vanek-Smith: David Buick is a partner at BGC Partners. David, thank you for talking with us.
Buick: It's a great pleasure.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.