Old mortgage practice has merit
The plan to help homeowners facing foreclosure will cost $40 billion, and the money would come from the original pool of bailout money. But commentator Andrew Caplin resurrects an old idea that doesn't involve all that cash.
Commentator and economist Andrew Caplin (Andrew Caplin)
More on The Economy, Housing - Real Estate, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF COMMENTARY
KAI RYSSDAL: With today's new mortgage plan from the FDIC, there is some hope for homeowners staring down the barrel of foreclosure in this economy. As John Dimsdale was telling us, the $40 billion it's gonna cost will come out of the original pool of bailout money.
But commentator and economist Andrew Caplin says helping troubled homeowners doesn't necessarily need oceans of government cash -- he says it can be done using a type of mortgage developed 40 years ago, but never widely used.
ANDREW CAPLIN: In most parts of the country, house prices are plummeting. Families are defaulting on their mortgages and being kicked out of their homes. That's bad news for them, but also for us, because bonds issued on the backs of those mortgages are being bought by the government as part of the Wall Street bailout. The more borrowers who default, the less those bonds -- our bonds -- are worth. Future taxpayers -- our children -- are being condemned to a subprime future.
But there is a way out of this mess. Meet SAM. SAM is a shared appreciation mortgage, where the lender and the borrower essentially become stakeholders in the house, and where both profit when a home increases in value. SAM can reduce defaults and loan losses and give us taxpayers a fighting chance of coming out on top.
Here's how: Imagine a family that took out a $200,000 mortgage but can only afford payments on a loan only three-quarters that size. The hole they're in gets deeper when the value of the house falls. Rather than repossess the house the lender can opt to refinance the mortgage with a $150,000 SAM. That way, the lender gets something in exchange for the write-down: a significant share of any future appreciation in the house. So, if five years later, the house is sold into a recovered market for $200,000, the lender would get an appropriate share of that profit.
If we allowed SAM in this country, taxpayers would get a share of the appreciation in any houses that got written down. This would reduce the odds of the homeowner defaulting and increase the value of those bonds that you and I now own.
Tragically, as useful as SAMs could be to our economy, we can't use them. The IRS imposed a block on SAMs nearly 40 years ago. But that block could be lifted with the stroke of the Treasury secretary's pen. Henry Paulson should pick that pen up and save our children from a subprime future.
RYSSDAL: Andrew Caplin is a professor of economics at New York University.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From palo alto, CA, 10/24/2008
Great idea as also are ones written about by Joe Nocera in NYT. Read today in NYT that hedge fuds are getting into act! Why isn't govt. paying attention to great ideas and do something now and cost taxpayeers less?!
From Colorado springs, CO, 10/24/2008
SAM (shared appreciation mortgage) may sound great for the time being. There must be a reason why the IRS shut it down. Does anyone knows why? Is it possible this SAM may also have loopholes for financial exploitation by Wall Street?
From phoenix, AZ, 10/24/2008
I listened to this last evening .... I am amazed at the number of really intelligent people we have in this country... Why aren't they running this place ???? Oh that's right, they're to smart to put up with the bs game ....
From Austin, TX, 10/23/2008
What a wonderful solution to the mortgage crisis that is affecting citizens. The government seems to be able to pull out all the stops to save the banking institutions that fed this mess. Now it's time for Uncle Sam to support the constituents of this fine country by approving SAM. The most important part of the solution to our economic crisis is to get the middle class solvent again. SAM can do this and we should insitute it immediately. What can we do to insure this?
10/23/2008
This is the most technically informative commentary I've heard on Marketplace in a couple of weeks. I've always wondered why banks never take equity stakes in homes. It's illegal! Illegal? But, why?
Many commentators opine about how the current crisis is the result of deregulation. But, how many practices (like SAMs) are actually outlawed? And, if SAMs could help, isn't it still (partly) regulatory practices that are causing the crisis?
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.