Cost of rescue plan keeps on growing
The Treasury Department's rescue plan is looking a lot different than what was sold to Congress in September. With so much taxpayer money on the line, the tab's getting bigger than lawmakers imagined. Our Washington Bureau Chief John Dimsdale reports.
Speaker of the House Sen. Nancy Pelosi speaks during a news conference with House Financial Services Committee Chairman Sen. Barney Frank on Capitol Hill Sept. 26, 2008. (Sen. Nancy Pelosi)
More on The Economy, Politics, Fed. Budget/Govt. Spending, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: I don't know if you noticed, but we've been talking about the bailout plan for, what, four minutes now? And nobody's said the words Treasury Department or Henry Paulson. That's not us missing something. It's just the politics of it. The Treasury Department's rescue plan is looking a whole lot different than what was sold to Congress in September. And with so much taxpayer money on the line, our Washington bureau chief John Dimsdale reports the tab's getting bigger than lawmakers ever imagined.
John Dimsdale: Only $20 billion of the $800 billion in taxpayer loans announced today comes from the congressionally approved TARP bailout. The rest will be put up by the Federal Reserve Bank. And Bob Eisenbeis, who used to be an economist at the Atlanta Fed, thinks he knows why.
Bob Eisenbeis: It's all money out of the same pot in a sense. Except one doesn't have to get approval from Congress to use the Federal Reserve's balance sheet.
Eisenbeis says the Treasury Department wants to keep the bailout money in reserve for the next administration. Roughly half of that $700 billion has been committed. But with all the changes in the bailout, New Jersey Republican Representative Scott Garrett says Congress is feeling some buyer's remorse. He voted against the bailout because he didn't think there was enough accountability for taxpayer money.
Scott Garrett: I think most people who voted yes thought that they were buying a certain program. That is, buying mortgage-backed securities and that was it. Now, of course, they see "Wait a minute, it wasn't that, it went to something else, went to something else, and maybe it's back to buying mortgage-backed securities. And oh, by the way, the Federal Reserve is doing it too. So, I think the people who voted yes are probably going to be the ones leading the charge, saying "Wait a minute. Let's take a second look at what we authorized here."
And members of Congress know there's an extra reason they'll be held responsible for the success or failure of the taxpayer bailout says Bob Eisenbeis.
Eisenbeis: The current administration is not going to be around when that assessment takes place.
In Washington, I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
11/25/2008
No one seriously believes the Bush regime is funneling bailout money through the Fed because they want to leave most of the $700 billion for Obama's crew. The Bush regime is just being its old imperious self by avoiding the messy impediments of democracy. But the claim that those who voted for the %700 billion bill did not understand it is equally incredulous; or perhaps it's fair to say that they understood it in the ways they understand all the things that they do.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.