Panel questions how SEC missed Madoff
The Securities and Exchange Commission came under scrutiny today at a hearing of a House committee exploring how Bernard Madoff got away with his Ponzi scheme, even after the SEC had been warned about him. Nancy Marshall Genzer reports.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission seal hangs on the facade of its building in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
More on Wall Street, America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: Even given all we've been through courtesy of Wall Street the past 18 months, the case of Bernard Madoff continues to be the icing on the cake. Madoff was arrested three weeks ago amid charges he'd been running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme. He was in court today in New York. Prosecutors are trying to get his bail revoked, saying he's a flight risk. The judge put off a decision on that matter. But down in Washington, Mr. Madoff was present in spirit.
The House Financial Services committee is trying to figure out how the Securities and Exchange Commission missed this guy. Marketplace's Nancy Marshall Genzer explains.
Nancy Marshall Genzer: The SEC received complaints about Madoff for more than a decade. One whistleblower told the SEC repeatedly that the steady gains Madoff was reporting to investors were mathematically impossible. The SEC did investigate, but never accused Madoff of wrongdoing.
Paul Kanjorski: Our regulatory system has failed miserably, and we must rebuild it now.
That's Congressman Paul Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat. The agency's critics say SEC officials don't aggressively investigate Wall Street because they're hoping to get lucrative jobs at the very firms they oversee. Donald Langevoort disagrees. He's a former SEC lawyer now at Georgetown University. Langevoort says the problem is the SEC doesn't want to hurt investor confidence even if it's false confidence.
Donald Langevoort: When you see a bubble -- when employment or the stock market is increasing -- the message is, don't mess with that.
Another problem is, Madoff wasn't required to register his hedge fund with the SEC. The thinking is, only rich people can afford to invest in hedge funds, so they must be savvy enough to protect themselves. Wrong. Jim Coffman is a retired SEC investigator.
Jim Coffman: Should we be looking at hedge funds that control trillions of dollars and are virtually unregulated? That's something that Congress is going to have to take another look at, I think, after this.
For now, the SEC's inspector general says he'll examine its enforcement operations and inspection divisions and make recommendations.
In Washington, I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.