GOP wants more tax cuts in stimulus
President Obama met today with congressional leaders to discuss the best way to kick-start the economy. House members will try to pass their bill next week, but a large number of Republicans take issue with some of the stimulus proposals. John Dimsdale reports.
President Obama speaks about the economic stimulus package with congressional leaders at the White House. From left, Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.), House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
More on America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: President Obama met with congressional leaders at the White House today. They gathered to mull over their differences on the best ways to kick-start the economy. Senate Democrats issued their stimulus proposals. It's got more tax cuts and less spending than the House version that came out a week or so ago. House leaders are going to try to pass their bill sometime next week, over the objections of a large number of Republicans. Our Washington bureau chief John Dimsdale took a look at the differences.John Dimsdale: Most of the $825 billion in the House Democrats' stimulus package would be spent on infrastructure and job-creation projects. Tax breaks make up only 40 percent of the total. Senate Democrats today issued a $700 billion proposal, more than half in the form of tax cuts. That's more to the liking of Republicans, who believe lower taxes would be a quicker boost to the economy. And they'd like to scale back the overall size. House minority leader John Boehner spoke to reporters after the White House meeting.
John Boehner: We believe that spending nearly a trillion dollars is really more than what we ought to be putting on the backs of our kids and their kids.
Mark Zandi: Let me say I think the package should be bigger.
Mark Zandi of Economy.com doesn't think the question comes down to spending versus tax cuts. Since interest rates are at record lows, why can't the government borrow enough to do both?
Zandi: I would, if I were king for the day, expand the package and I would increase the size of the tax cuts. While it doesn't pack the same economic punch as spending, it doesn't create as many jobs, you can get it into the economy quickly and the economy needs help here and now.
President Obama meets with Republicans on Capitol Hill next week to attract more bipartisan support for a stimulus package.
In Washington I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
01/24/2009
The way I see it, is money should be put into projects that create value on the long term. Tax cuts should only be used as they create value for the long term, for example, tax credit for energy saving projects, or energy efficient cars, or anything that creates jobs. Also, the money for public works should be put where they create assets (and not liabilities) that not only create short term jobs, but also long term jobs, and savings. Any project in which money is put should be a self sustaining project on the long run. These projects should be prioritized on the long term value they bring. Some money should also be made available to create new innovative businesses, so maybe the Small Business Administration is probably an excellent way to distribute the incentives as it reaches small businesses that move our economy.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.