FCC nominee raises high-tech hopes
President Obama is expected to nominate his top technology adviser, Julius Genachowski, for chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. His appointment could significantly affect the nation's high-tech landscape. Ronni Radbill reports.
Julius Genachowski (http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2009/01/13_genachowski-.html)
More on Science
TEXT OF STORY
President Obama is expected to nominate his top technology adviser to chair the Federal Communications Commission. If that happens, the FCC could lead the nation into a new technological era. From Washington, Ronni Radbill reports.
RONNI RADBILL: Julius Genachowski is one of the key architects of the president's highly successful Internet campaign. He helped draft many of Mr. Obama's telecommunications policies and served as chief council to FCC Chairman Reed Hundt during the Clinton era.
With Genachowski at the helm of the FCC, improving high-speed Internet access is expected to be a top priority.
That sits well with Ben Scott, policy director for the public interest group Free Press. He says international surveys show the U.S. is plummeting in rankings when it comes to providing fast, low-cost access to the Web.
BEN SCOTT: Every year that goes by that our global competitors have better broadband Internet infrastructure than the United States, we lose jobs, we lose economic growth to those countries.
Genachowski supports increasing and expanding broadband service, especially to rural and low-income areas. Unlike former FCC Republican Chairman Kevin Martin, Genachowski wants Net neutrality, that means opening up cable, digital phone and fiber-optic lines to competition.
Richard Wiley, a former Republican chairman of the FCC, and managing partner of Wiley Rein law firm, questions how much Genachowski can get done.
WILEY REIN: Hopefully, because he's a smart guy, I think he will realize that putting a lot of new heavy regulation in place might not be the right thing to do when these industries are hurting. I think in the broadcast industry, in particular.
Unlike his predecessor, Genachowski opposes large media companies buying up TV and radio stations across the country. He instead would encourage diversity in broadcast media ownership. The former chair focused a lot of his attention on cable regulations, such as bundling and pricing. But analysts don't expect Genachowski to be as aggressive with the cable industry.
Instead, Rebecca Arbogast an analyst with investment firm Stifel Nicolaus, says the FCC will focus more on new media, like Google and Yahoo.
REBECCA ARBOGAST: The set of voices that are there, it's no longer just Verizon versus Comcast versus a competitive local carrier.
Whatever regulatory action the FCC does take will depend largely on the state of the economy. With the country in a recession, analysts say there's a limit to just how much can be accomplished.
In Washington, I'm Ronni Radbill for Marketplace
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From New York, NY, 02/03/2009
The FCC has been lackadaisical at best in its ability separate corporate policy from national interest. I found John Windhausen's report on Broadband an interesting primer on both the history of FCC action and the issue of Broadband itself. It can be found here: http://www.tcf.org/Publications/mediapolitics/windhausen.pdf
02/03/2009
I have high hopes. Something needs to be done for people who live in rural areas. There have been several pieces of legislation that have went through to expand broadband, but the large corporations only used it to expand into nearby high density areas, while many of us in the country are still sitting on sixty year old telephone lines. Where I live in Indiana, we can't even connect at 52k. 19.2k is our average connectivity. What's more is that even something so low-tech as ISDN is not available due to it being "outdated." We have been promised better connectivity for over six years with absolutely no movement. I am not expecting fiber to my home, but I do expect at least decade old technology if these companies are still going to use tax money to develop rural areas.
Whoever is the eventual pick, I wish them luck, for everyone's sake.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.