Drinking water costs lots of dollars
Drinking water across the nation is getting more and more expensive. Some say it's the private sector that is pushing those prices up. Elaine Grant reports.
A glass of tap water (iStockPhoto)
More on Sustainability
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: As if we didn't have enough to worry about already. Today the World Bank said the recession here and abroad is threatening water projects around the world. And it says industrialized countries like the United States haven't set aside enough stimulus-package money to replace our aging water infrastructure. According to the United Nations that could cost upwards of $200 billion a year. None of which is lost on towns and cities in this country where drinking water is getting more and more expensive. And some say the private sector is helping to push those prices up. From New Hampshire Public Radio, Elaine Grant reports.
ELAINE GRANT: Locke Lake Colony is a rural development of 900 homes in central New Hampshire. It's beautiful, but under the surface the community has a lot of problems. The water system is decades old. Some days, says resident Mike Rinaldi, you'd turn on the tap and nothing would come out. So a private water company bought Locke Lake's system and invested $2.5 million fixing it.
MIKE RINALDI: We now have water. They're still working on some of the pipes because some of the pipes are dated back to the 1960s.
But now, the company wants to triple Locke Lake's water rates. That could mean paying an extra $1,000 a year. And Rinaldi says his neighbors can't afford it.
RINALDI: They're going to be hit hard, they really, really are. We had two people that were on fixed incomes that when they found out about this tried to put their houses up on the market, but they just can't sell it.
More and more people are struggling to pay high water bills. Today, 14 percent of Americans get their water from for-profit companies. And many are hiking their rates. Private utilities argue they're investing in projects like new wells and pipes. Critics say these businesses are just trying to maximize profits. Most states set a cap on how much profit these utilities can make -- typically 10 percent. And it's rare for companies to make less than that. Jon Keesecker is a researcher with Food and Water Watch.
JON Keesecker: In California, Illinois, Wisconsin and New York, households receiving water from a private water company paid on average 13 to 50 percent more than households receiving water from a public-water utility.
Industry lobbyists say their prices may look higher, but that's because when a city provides water, some of the cost is paid for with local taxes. But when a commercial water company fixes a system, customers bear the full expense. And that's hard on small communities.
PETER Cook: Small system problems is the Achilles heel of the water business in the United States.
That's Peter Cook, executive director of the National Association of Water Companies. He argues that private utilities are more efficient, especially in larger towns and cities. But most of the systems that private companies run are small rural ones.
COOK: Many of them, if not most of them, all are troubled because of the small economies of scale and the fact that their populations probably aren't big-wage earners and have limited funds.
No matter the price, Jon Keesecker of Food and Water Watch argues that selling water for profit is a bad idea.
KEESECKER: I think when folks see water being privatized, they see a price being put on something that's essential.
And it's becoming more and more essential to fix this country's aging and leaky plumbing. The federal stimulus package includes more than eight billion dollars for drinking and wastewater-treatment projects. That money should begin to flow soon. Then the big question will be, will it help ease the pain at the tap?
From Barnstead, New Hampshire, I'm Elaine Grant for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Miami, FL, 04/10/2009
The cost of water everywhere is increasing due to scarcity of sources and regulatory requirements designed to protect public health and the environment. Conservation is clearly the least cost alternative to meet future water supply needs, and relamation of wastewater to serve a variety of needs is becoming standard practice. As a public water supply, we have an obligation to provide a safe, reliable product at the lowest cost, including the cost of proper maintenance. To put things into perspective, we ask our customers to compare their water bill with their other utilities (such as power and cable). Americans still have the best and least expensive water in the world.
From Ludlow, MA, 03/18/2009
Your story yesterday regarding the condition of our aging drinking water infrastructure and the argument over public and private management of them was very timely. This morning in the city of Springfield, MA, a major transmission water main broke cutting off or reducing water to thousands of residents here and in several surrounding towns serviced by this municipal water system, and closing some major streets due to flooding. Schools and business were forced to close or were adversely affected.
Link: http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/water_main_break_forces_closin.html?category=Longmeadow+category=Ludlow+category=Springfield
Also, another city, Bethesda, Maryland suffered a similar fate yesterday as well.
On the bright side, having a municipal water system is far less expensive than going private and for profit.
Paul Zielinski, Ludlow, MA (Listens to Marketplace on WFCR-88.5FM, Springfield/Amherst, MA)
From Sparks, NV, 03/18/2009
One of the problems of municipal ownership is underfunding of capital improvements and long-term maintenance. To keep rate-payers (voters) happy, they tend to keep rates artificially low. This is one reason why they are looking to privatize. The government entities would like to have the cash from selling their water systems and stop the drain on revenues. The private companies always sound good (that's marketing). There are trade-offs either way. We can't expect either governments or companies to protect our interests without at least minimal citizen oversight and involvement. Due diligence applies to us all.
From falmouth, MA, 03/17/2009
Not all municipal utilities fund part of the water utility from general taxes. The municipal water supply is funded entirely by rate payers That pays for the water production (facility, utilities, chemicals, reair, etc.) Employees salaries and associated costs including part tems of the public works director, tyown manager and others. Like most things nothing can be painted with one brush.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.