How a 'Cap and Trade' system will work
A House committee is weighing legislation to slash greenhouse gases. The centerpiece of the strategy will be a 'Cap and Trade' system. Sustainability reporter Sarah Gardner breaks down how it'll work with Kai Ryssdal.
A green world (iStockPhoto)
More on Sustainability
TEXT OF INTERVIEW
Kai Ryssdal: Democratic leaders in the House have been promising a vote on climate change legislation by the end of the week. According to a Reuters poll out today, they've got enough votes to get the package to the floor anyway. If it does pass -- and if it makes it by the Senate -- the bill would gradually cut greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade or so. The centerpiece of the whole thing is a business model, really, that's known as cap and trade. It's a term we hear all the time, but one that doesn't make much sense without some explanation. So Sarah Gardner's here from the Marketplace Sustainability Desk to help us understand. Hey Sarah.
SARAH GARDNER: Hi Kai.
Ryssdal: All right, let's start with the beginning of this thing, the cap part. What is being capped under cap and trade?
GARDNER: Well the idea is to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide we put out into the atmosphere. So, Congress would cap or limit the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions every year.
Ryssdal: All right, and trade?
GARDNER: The trade part. What's traded are the rights to emit those greenhouse gases under the legal limits.
Ryssdal: OK, how do you trade a right, though? You can trade oil, you can trade stocks, trading a right, I don't get it.
GARDNER: Ok, well, you can think of that right as say a license to pollute. And then you just turn that license into a tradeable commodity, like you said, just like oil or pork bellies. And major polluters will receive some of these carbon permits for free, but they'll also have to buy some of them at auction. So they'll have these permits in hand and then they'll be able to start trading them. They'll trade them depending on their emissions needs from year to year.
- Meet Cap 'n Trade
- (Marketplace)
Ryssdal: What's the point though of trading them?
GARDNER: Instead of a top-down government mandate, the idea is to let the market work and find the cheapest, most efficient way to get to these reductions. Here's how it might work. Say you've got Joe's Power and Light Company. And Joe has a fairly new coal-fired power plant, and he needs to run it full-steam. He needs more carbon permits.
Ryssdal: Because he needs to pollute more.
GARDNER: That's right. He needs to find them on the market. He can then go to the market and buy more carbon permits from say Sam's Power and Light, because Sam is perhaps already investing in solar, he's emitting less, and he has permits to spare.
Ryssdal: What's the incentive, though, for polluters to eventually clean things up?
GARDNER: OK, this is key. The emissions cap is going to get tighter and tighter as the years go on. There are fewer in circulation, supply shrinks and theoretically these permits are getting more expensive. If you're still out there polluting like crazy, it's going to take a lot of money to keep that up. So there's your incentive to clean up your act.
Ryssdal: You know, we are treating this, or Congress is I suppose, like it's never been done before. Is that true?
GARDNER: No, we have some experience with this. We have a national cap and trade program for sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain. We've had it since the mid-90s, and it's been very successful. Having said that, the sulfur dioxide problem has been a little simpler. Reducing greenhouse gases involves transitioning to whole new technologies, it's not just adding scrubbers to existing plants. But, Kai, no cap and trade program is going to work unless politicians are willing to enforce it, and let permit prices get high enough, so that it changes consumer behavior and corporate behavior. So stay tuned. We'll see what happens.
Ryssdal: All right, Sarah Gardner, from our Sustainability Desk on cap and trade. Sarah, thanks a lot.
GARDNER: Thank you.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Green Bank, WV, 05/21/2009
So the right to pollute is going to be traded as a comodity but the people being polluted upon get no compensation. Once again someone will be making extra money by throwing their trash down wind and the down winders are ignored.
From Chicago, IL, 05/21/2009
Why has there been no discussion of the consequences of such a policy? By making it difficult to emit CO2, gas prices will rise sharply, but that is not tragic because it is not practical for most people to drive to another country to fill their tank. The real problem is industry. Aluminum refining, a high energy process by nature will move offshore. The bauxite will still be mined in the USA, but exported for processing. Leaving the larger value add with another country. If this model looks familiar, it is, this is typical of the African economies. I can not believe that a relatively well educated population can not see this. It looks like a little too much book learning and a complete lack of common sense. But then again, that is the root cause of the financial crisis, losing site of the basics.
From San Diego, CA, 05/20/2009
Really informative story. It would have been helpful to mention how this is working out in Europe. Thanks for all your great reporting kai and Sarah!
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.