Social media gets the job done at work
In many workplaces, watching YouTube or browsing Facebook is a no-no. But some companies like IBM are starting to encourage employees to use social media while on the job. Devin Dwyer reports.
Facebook Web site on a browser (Getty Images)
TEXT OF STORY
KAI RYSSDAL: If you've got a desk job, you're familiar with the temptation. In between writing reports or working on a spreadsheet, you click over to Twitter or Facebook to see what's going on out there.
We all do it, even though it's probably against the strict letter of your company's Internet policy. Pressure to loosen those restrictions though is mounting, and some companies have actually encouraging social media use on the job. As Devin Dwyer reports now from New York.
Devin Dwyer: Imagine your boss asking you to blog, use Facebook and watch YouTube videos on company time. That's what happens at IBM.
Tim Washer: And this first line, as you see Peter, that's the punch line.
Peter Thomas: The monster comes up there.
Washer: That's right.
Thomas: yeah, I'll try three, OK.
Tim Washer is IBM's web video manager. He's on a conference call with Peter Thomas, the voice of Burger King commercials. And they're reading the script for a video for YouTube.
Thomas: Separating useful information from oceans of irrelevant data has become the key to understanding the world that we live in.
The video touts one of IBM's latest innovations, but it's not an advertisement. Clips like this one go on YouTube so the company's 400,000 can view them around the world. They help educate workers and generate buzz around the office. And they're just one part of the social media culture at IBM.
Thirty three-year-old consultant Michelle O'Malley says online social networks are places IBM-ers exchange ideas and build professional relationships.
Michelle O'Malley: You almost feel like if you're not on Facebook you're doing something wrong. Everyone at IBM is on Facebook and it's not just my level or my age range -- it's all the way up the chain.
But isn't surfing Facebook and watching YouTube videos supposed to be a waste of company time? IBM treats a five-minute break to browse the internet like a coffee or smoke break. But that's not the management style at many businesses.
David Meerman Scott is a social media consultant. He says more than half of U.S. companies ban employees from using blogs and online communities at work.
David Meerman Scott: Do companies ban people from going to the water cooler to talk? Of course they don't. But they choose to ban tools of social media, because they're scared of them or because they don't understand them.
Scott says that can be a turn-off for young, tech-savvy workers.
Scott: If you don't trust your employees to do the right thing, your employees aren't going to trust you to be an organization that's worthy of working at.
Some businesses say rules against social media make sense. Investment banks want to avoid the risk of insider trading. Legal firms need to protect confidential client information. And, pharmaceutical companies worry about the liability of engaging patients on blogs and chat rooms.
Ray Kerins: The more people are actually sharing their information with us, the more we actually have to respond.
That's Ray Kerins of Pfizer, speaking at a meeting of communications executives. He says drug makers are unsure of whether to investigate and report potential drug side effects they learn about online. They don't want to be fined by the FDA or have to investigate every case, no matter how dubious the claim.
Kerins says that's why only Pfizer's PR staff can use social media for now.
Kerins: The challenge is, we're a regulated industry. There is no guidance right now about what we can or cannot do in this space. There needs to be.
In 2007, half of all adults used online social tools. That's grown to three quarters of adults today. Kerins says for companies like Pfizer, it's no longer a question of whether to adopt social media, but how to adopt it, as more tech-savvy employees seek to log-on at work.
In New York, I'm Devin Dwyer for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From los angeles, CA, 06/04/2009
"...it's no longer a question of whether to adopt social media, but how to adopt it, as more tech-savvy employees seek to log-on at work."
i'll second mr smith's comment. the first thing that occurred to me on hearing this was, "but aren't young tech-savvy employees toting iphones and blackberries? they don't even need your network."
From Washington, DC, 06/01/2009
My company is one of those that is "strongly encouraging" us to leverage social media as marketing tool. In fact we've been told to put our Twitter usernames and FB pages in our email signatures! I first "tweeted" in December and stuck with it for a couple months but was quickly annoyed by the proliferation of useless/pointless tweets: "Waiting for delayed flight at O'Hare and eating a ham sandwich" or "It's raining again I need a latte." On the other hand, I have learned about worthwhile white papers, articles and blogs and marketing experts. The only problem is finding the time to follow all the tweets and digesting the info found in them! Huge time suck.
From Cave Creek, AZ, 05/30/2009
Our organization openly embraces the use of Social Media. We trust our employees to stay on task and use these sites profssionally. So far we've not had any negative issues. I can understand the concern in some of the regulated industries mentioned. I venture a guess that many of the employees in those industries are circumventing corporate policy by using their smart phones to check Facebook, Twitter, etc. Corporate America was afraid of the internet when it began to take off. Social Media usage is catching on at a much faster rate. Organizations are going to need to address its use pretty quickly.
From Lexington, MA, 05/30/2009
Mr. Hillinger - I respectfully disagree, I've never seen a company ban email or the telephone. Social Media is no different. It may sound harsh, but if there is a cancer you need to cut it out by firing the employee that abuses social media, not ban the technology.
David
05/29/2009
In response to Mr. Scott's comments, if employers realized the outbreak of a disease was caused by the staff gathering at the water cooler, they would prevent them from meeting there. Social networking sites are often a source of infection (computer, not human), resulting in loss of productivity and increased costs to many businesses.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.