Gov't is reluctant to get TARP repaid
Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and others have raised billions to pay back TARP funds. But the government is reluctant to get repaid. Why? Amy Scott reports.
The Morgan Stanley building in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
More on America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, and American Express raised a couple of billion dollars in the stock market today. The Federal Reserve told them they had to if they want to give back all that cumbersome bailout money. You might think the government would be thrilled to get paid back. But as Marketplace's Amy Scott reports, it has been dragging its feet.
AMY SCOTT: In order to return the government's money, banks have to prove that they can stand on their own. This week the Fed added a new condition -- that the banks show they can sell large quantities of stock to investors. Douglas Elliott is a fellow at the Brookings Institution. He says the government is reluctant to give up its stake.
DOUGLAS ELLIOTT: We don't know for absolute certain that we're through the crisis. It's safer to have the additional capital. Perhaps more importantly, the administration would like the banks to be doing more lending. They're more likely to do that if they have a bigger capital base.
Elliott says the government could use the money. The repaid funds could replenish the TARP, and help out struggling smaller banks. It also sends a message to taxpayers and investors that the economy is stabilizing. Linus Wilson teaches finance at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. He says raising money on the stock market shows the big banks don't need government help.
LINUS WILSON: If these banks repay TARP, taxpayers win because they lose less money to the banks. And banks win because they get government off their back. And it's also a good thing that they're raising common equity because that makes them less likely to need to be bailed out in the future.
Banks like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have been eager to repay the TARP funds. Bankers say the money carried too high a price, restrictions on executive pay and a stigma with investors.
In New York, I'm Amy Scott for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
06/03/2009
I am perplexed as to why the media allows the banks and government to pretend that the TARP is the only bailout/subsidy going on. They all act as if the TARP gets repaid, then the committments are severed. Which is of course complete nonsense.
Estimates of total government guarantees and bailouts amount to more than $10 trillion dollars. All of which provide real financial value to banks.
And this excludes the benefit of getting free money at the FED discount window and being allowed to use toxic assets as collateral - a priviledge now extended to more than just the primary dealers. Then there's the guarantees - FDIC, money market funds, commercial paper, mortgage agencies...; there's the short selling protection; the revised accounting rules....
The government has committed far more taxpayer resources to saving the banks than just the TARP, trillions of dollars worth more. Marketplace could provide a valuable service by educating the public about the big picture, rather than playing along with the charade that the TARP represents more than jst one small piece.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.