When to start economic 'exit strategy'
The term 'exit strategy' is being bandied about as more forecasters contemplate a better economy. But when that exit should happen is the critical question. John Dimsdale reports.
An exit sign for economic recovery (iStockPhoto)
More on America's Financial Crisis
TEXT OF STORY
KAI RYSSDAL: As economists begin to at least consider the end of this recession, there's a new phrase that's starting to gain some traction. It's more familiar in a military context than economic. But it makes some sense if you think about it: Exit strategy. As in, how can the government work its way out of the extraordinary economic pump-priming that's been going on for a year or more now? It'll be a topic of conversation when the Federal Reserve meets next week.
And our Washington bureau chief John Dimsdale reports that when to start that exit is the crucial question.
John Dimsdale: The Federal Reserve has essentially been stomping on the gas pedal to try to keep the economic engine from sputtering. Once that engine starts to run on its own, too much gas will cause inflation. The Fed has to know when to start hitting the brakes.
Former Fed member Laurence Meyer says the timing of that maneuver is tricky.
Laurence Meyer: You can begin too soon and dampen the recovery, which needs to be very robust to bring that unemployment rate down. And of course you could tighten too late and have higher inflation as a result.
Meyer says the Fed has the tools to take money out of the system quickly. When the time comes, it can call in short-term loans and raise the interest rates. Some inflation-averse countries, like Germany, are already calling on the Fed to head for the exits. But others point to 1937, when the decision to tighten the money supply too soon after the Great Depression caused a recession. This year, there are no signs of an overheating economy.
But Wesleyan University's Richard Grossman says figuring out when to ease up on the stimulus is an art, not a science.
Richard Grossman: Even if there's an uptick in economic activity, is that the beginning of the recovery that could be inflationary? Or is that just a temporary blip and the next month the economic numbers won't look so good and we should therefore hold off on contractionary monetary policy?
In a speech earlier this week, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said sometimes it takes more than good forecasting to know when to change policy.
Charles Evans: And a little bit of good luck would be nice, too.
In Washington, I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From silver spring, MD, 06/20/2009
Opinion on Canadian Banks as a conservative investment.
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.