U.S. seeks emissions data from China
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said consumers should pay for the carbon content of the goods they consume, even from other countries like China. One option is imposing trade tariffs, but that proposal has the potential to set off a trade war. Sam Eaton reports.
'Made in China' label (iStockPhoto)
More on Spending, Sustainability, International
TEXT OF STORY
KAI RYSSDAL: The U.S. trade relationship with China is a complicated one. Climate change isn't making it any easier. The Chinese make a lot of the stuff we want to buy. That means their factories are putting out a lot of greenhouse gasses on our behalf. Today in Beijing Commerce Secretary Gary Locke said American consumers should pay for the carbon content of what we consume. Sounds simple. But of course it's not.
From the Marketplace Sustainability Desk, Sam Eaton reports.
Sam Eaton: Accounting for the environmental costs of consumer products has long been the rallying call of environmentalists. Not anymore. This week, Wal-Mart announced plans to measure the environmental impact of every product that hits its shelves. Even U.S. manufacturers are now on board. That is, as long as the climate legislation in Congress passes and as long as they're not the sole target.
Scott Segal is an industry lobbyist with Bracewell & Giuliani.
Scott Segal: What we're talking about here is making sure that Chinese goods don't have an unfair competitive advantage by virtue of the fact that their manufacturers haven't had to pay to control carbon.
Today's comments by Commerce Secretary Gary Locke in Shanghai confirms that even the White House may be reconsidering the idea of tariffs.
David Victor is an international relations professor at UC San Diego. He says there's no way to make a dent in global emissions, unless consumers pay the environmental costs of goods. But how do you determine those costs? He says it's one thing for Wal-Mart to tell its suppliers to pony up emissions data.
David Victor: It's another thing for a whole country to tell another country, the U.S. telling China, to report accurate data about the emissions that come from a whole bunch of factories across China that the Chinese government itself probably doesn't really administer very well.
Victor says the White House is most likely using trade tariffs as a threat to get China to reduce its emissions. But he says the problem with threats is that sometimes you have to act on them. And if that happens, he says the result would be an all-out trade war.
In Los Angeles, I'm Sam Eaton for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From New York, NY, 07/17/2009
"Trade tariffs" as opposed to what kind?
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.