Why digital is good for music
Greg Kot, music critic for the Chicago Tribune, talks with Kai Ryssdal about how the wired generation has revolutionized music through the digital platform.
Gret Kot (chicagopublicradio.org)
More on Arts - Culture, Bookshelf
Links
TEXT OF INTERVIEW
Kai Ryssdal: Two items from the music world to get us going on this next story. The new video from Madonna's greatest hits album "Celebration" will debut on iTunes tomorrow as a free download. Also tomorrow, fans of Jay-Z can listen to his new album for free, almost two weeks before its official rollout.
For most consumers music is all about digital nowadays. Even if a whole lot of record executives haven't been so eager to embrace it. For them, online distribution is the kiss of death or close it.
But Greg Kot has a different take. He's the music critic for the Chicago Tribune. He also hosts a public radio program on music called "Sound Opinions," produced, as we are, by American Public Media. And he's got a new book out about music in the Internet age called "Ripped," in which he says the digital revolution that has come to the recording industry is far from all bad.
Greg Kot: There is a part of the music industry that is dying as a result of what's happening on the Internet. But I think a new industry is being born, a grassroots industry.
Ryssdal: Walk me through the business model then. These bands, whether they're established or up and comers, they get to go directly to the fans. How does that business model work? How do people make money out of it?
KOT: I think what it comes down to is building a community around what an artist may do. I think what was happening in the past, where everything was being funneled through a few big corporations, a few big record companies, a few big radio stations, fans really didn't feel personally invested in the artist. And what the Internet is facilitating is artists communicating directly with their fans and vice versa. To the point where you have fans participating in the art, whether it's making videos, or doing remixes, they feel part of the equation. And as a result they're investing in the artist in numerous ways.
Ryssdal: Who's doing it really well, though, Greg?
KOT: I think some of the biggest examples, the most well-known examples, are bands like Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails.
Ryssdal: But Radiohead and a guy like Trent Reznor and Nine Inch Nails, they're established artists, right, they've got the fan base out there. How does this work to the advantage of a newer artist, who's just getting started, has a great stuff, but needs that outlet, that distribution chain.
KOT: Well, it's a good question and my simple solution to it is be good. You know, it's very hard to keep a secret on the Internet. If your music is genuinely good, you will not be a secret for very long. I think the key is start small, start with a community base, start with a few hardcore fans and build it from there. And secondly lower your overhead. Keep your operations small and surround yourself with a few invested businessmen. In other words, you still need infrastructure, but it should be a lot smaller.
Ryssdal: So who is good right now?
KOT: There's a ton of people out there that are making music that's amazing. The reason Lil Wayne is one of the rap superstars now is that he was constantly distributing these mix tapes through illicit channels on the Web, and getting this music to his fans. And getting fans excited about him, and his personality, and what he was doing. And I think in the next 10 years we're going to see a lot more stars developing out of it.
Ryssdal: There is an element of the free business model here, right? You give a bunch of stuff away to hope that you attract more fans, who will then after hearing a song or two, maybe pony up $10 to buy the album online.
KOT: Yes, people need to hear the music before they want to purchase, before they want to invest in you. The whole notion that the music industry has been operating under for the last 10, 15 years is that every download represents a lost sale. You know, what has radio been except for a free download? People want to hear the music first before they invest in it. If it's good, they're going to want more of it, not less.
Ryssdal: Does this mean then the increasing nichification of this music, where bands go out and find fans who like this band in particular. Does that mean the days of the blockbuster, globe-shattering bands like U2 and the Rolling Stones are done with?
KOT: Yeah, I'm crying a bitter tear here because those days are gone. I'm saying, what have we lost there? Seeing a mega band in a stadium, that's a good experience for somebody? I've been in the last row for a Rolling Stones show, Kai. It's not a lot of fun back there.
Ryssdal: Greg Kot is the music critic for the Chicago Tribune. He hosts a public radio program on music called "Sound Opinions." Also, he writes books. He's the author of "Ripped: How the Wire Generation Revolutionized Music." Greg, thanks a lot.
KOT: Kai, my pleasure.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Toronto, ON, 09/02/2009
You're naive if you think radio has anything to do with control by the artist... quite the opposite.
From san Jose, CA, 09/01/2009
There exists technology to allow controlled downloading to just a select group of people who have a particular device. In this case a USB drive, and some fancy software. You can give or sell the devices to your fans, and then push digital content to them either for money or for free, giving the artist total control over what the fans get, and when they get it, and what the fans pay for. all sorts of media types are supported, so if a band wants to post pictures from a great performance, the fans world wide can get them in seconds. the data follows the device, and the device can be automatically updated, unlike a CD.
From Cardiff, NY, 08/31/2009
Comparing radio play to downloads is highly inaccurate. So much so I really think this guy is speaking out of turn and hence really can't have ever tried making a successful career from music.
Radio play = payment for play.
Downloading = nothing for play.
Radio play = controlled and chosen by the artist.
Downloading = music taken and downloaded against will (obviously not in all cases)
Radio play = the most effective taster and tempter to purchase if you want to rehear.
Downloading = no need to purchase if you want to rehear.
I love all the radio play we've ever had and I think every artists who's ever walked planet earth will have. Where as only rarely and occasionally will an artist welcome downloading - when it's legal downloading or a chosen promo tune. Unfortunately these are far from being a healthy percentage of the download world.
Your guy need to think about what he's saying before talking from such an authoritative base.
With a little bit of power comes a little bit of responsibility. ;-)
Cheers
Mayor
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.