L.A. luring filmmakers back home
For years, foreign countries and other U.S. cities and states have offered tax breaks and other incentives to lure filmmakers away from Los Angeles. Now, the L.A. City Council wants to put forth some incentives of its own. Stacey Vanek-Smith reports.
Crew members set up a camera for a shoot in Los Angeles (David McNew/Getty Images)
More on Entertainment
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: The lights and cameras might be here in Los Angeles, but increasingly the action is elsewhere. Foreign countries and other U.S. cities and states have been luring filmmakers away with tax breaks and other incentives for years. Now Los Angeles is mad as heck and not going to take it anymore. Marketplace's Stacey Vanek-Smith reports.
STACEY VANEK-SMITH: The L.A. City Council wants to offer tax incentives, make it easier to book locations and offer free parking -- the L.A. holy grail to film crews.
Jason Squire is with the USC film school. He says these incentives are long overdue.
JASON SQUIRE: For years, the city of Los Angeles has not been implementing this, believing that because it is the center of entertainment, that it wasn't necessary and it wasn't really a serious enough issue.
The number of films shot in California has dropped dramatically since 2003, costing the city jobs and revenue. During that time, more than 40 states were offering tax breaks and other perks to lure filmmakers. But as California is stepping up its incentives, a lot of those states have started scaling back.
HAL VOGEL: For most of these states it's really a waste of money. It actually ends up costing the taxpayers of the state a lot more than they think.
Entertainment industry analyst Hal Vogel says states thought the tax breaks would pay off in jobs and extra revenue. But the investment in infrastructure outweighed the money the films brought in. Michigan for instance, spent more than $30 million last year in tax incentives to film companies. Now the state is looking at a big budget shortfall and needs all the tax dollars it can get.
VOGEL: I mean there's a reason why L.A. didn't start making cars. Because the expertise to make cars is in Detroit but that's not the expertise of necessarily Detroit making movies.
Vogel says incentives do make sense in places like Los Angeles and New York, which have the infrastructure already in place.
I'm Stacey Vanek-Smith for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Ann Arbor, MI, 10/08/2009
Today Hal Vogel slighted the film industry in Michigan, with the audacious claim that Detroit only makes automobiles. Perhaps he should be a little more careful with such off the cuff remarks. The car industry has employed hundreds of motion picture technicials, artists and producers for decades, making the commercials, product videos and movies and industrials. Moreover, he should research the history of motion picture production in Michigan, especially since during the war years, more film was shot in Michigan, than in Hollywood. For the hundreds and hundreds of technicians, producers, editors, actors, studios, rental houses (yes all of these exist in Michigan) and local businesses that have reaped the benefits of the film incentives package in Michigan over the past 16 months, dismissing the package as ineffective, and a drain on the already strapped Michigan budget is not only irroneous, but a huge disservice to all of us that have made a good living from this business in Michigan for decades.
Andriy Pereklita
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.