A cap and trade system for people
Senators John Kerry, Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman shared the major features of legislation they're preparing to roll out soon with some big business execs. Included in the plan is a tax that encourages consumers to limit their emissions too. Mitchell Hartman reports.
CO2 skywriting (iStockPhoto)
More on Sustainability
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: While health care's been the belle of the ball, climate change legislation has been in the Congressional deep freeze for months now. But there does seem to be a bit of a thaw coming. At a meeting on Capitol Hill yesterday, key members of the Senate shared what they've been working on with some business groups. The once and future approach picks up where earlier legislation left off. It is supposed to limit industrial greenhouse gas emissions.
And there's a new twist too: Encouraging individuals to limit their pollution as well. Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman reports.
MITCHELL HARTMAN: This proposal uses a market-based system. The government caps emissions and companies trade pollution permits. But it also peppers in something else.
Lou Hayden of the American Petroleum Institute.
LOU HAYDEN: They're looking at a cap-and-trade approach for stationary sources of greenhouse gases, like utilities, some kind of linked fee on fuels.
It's that linked fee that's the new part. And it would cover gasoline, diesel, airplane fuel. Consumers would pay at the pump or the gate.
RON PERNICK: And that may look something more along the lines of a carbon tax, although they won't use the term tax.
Ron Pernick runs consulting firm Clean Edge. He says the goal is to have consumers see the cost directly.
PERNICK: We've gotten very used to low-cost energy, and energy is going to cost more.
AMANDA ROSEN: If you can directly attach a price to the use of carbon, people are going to be much less likely to use it in excess.
Amanda Rosen is a political scientist at Webster University. She says behavior is likely to change in the long run, as more fuel-efficient cars hit the market. But...
ROSEN: If you live in the suburbs and you need to commute into the city to work, you can't just buy a new house in the middle of the city, or change your childrens' schools, and move on a dime because your gas bill got really high. In terms of the short run, the changes you could make are actually pretty limited.
Rosen says people will probably have plenty of time to get ready. The legislation hasn't even been formally proposed yet.
I'm Mitchell Hartman for Marketplace.
Comments
Comment | Refresh
From Milan, MI, 03/27/2010
If our Congress was composed of sensible people, this bill would never get out of committee. Unfortunately, just as soon as global warming has been revealed as an obvious hoax and the public is coming to its senses, Congress is pressing on to, as usual, subsidize what doesn't work and tax what does.
From Pasadena,, CA, 03/20/2010
To Amanda Rosen's point... We could lower Americans' income and/or payroll tax before adding a carbon "fee" (or tax )reducing the economic impact of overall taxes on suburbia while still providing an incentive to switch behavior.
Assuming raising taxes on particular behavior would require an overall high tax environment and the cost to families could not be offset elsewhere is a falsehood and a poor reason to reject a carbon tax. Carbon taxes would replace other tax revenue requiring rewiring of the system. Given the political will to reduce energy dependency on foreign oil and the other benefits of a green economy... we may have a chance if this is explained properly and special interests behave themselves.
From TX, 03/19/2010
So, why not simplify my taxes and just tax the stuff when they pump it out of the ground? I'm going to get nailed at the pump, plane, and train one way or the other anyway, right?
From HI, 03/19/2010
"
thaw coming. At a meeting on Capitol Hill yesterday, key members of the Senate shared what they've been working on with some business groups. The once and future approach picks up where earlier legislation left off. It is supposed to limit industrial greenhouse gas
"
Swedes are now complaining that many of their wildlife extinct species have disappeared from the severe freeze this Winter. Add to that, Swedish Icebreakers have had a rough time getting the ships through to Stockholm. It is their worst winter in 15 years.
Are our elected officials all candidates for man of the year for year 2002? Have they fallen behind the curve? Should we grade them on the curve then leave them on the run? Or leave them on the runway? Or tie them to the runway?
U B Judge
U B Eskimo
Post a Comment: Please be civil, brief and relevant.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments are moderated. Marketplace reserves the right to edit any comments on this site and to read them on the air if they are extra-interesting. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting.
You must be 13 or over to submit information to American Public Media. The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party. For more information see Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.