• News/Talk
  • Music
  • Entertainment

Marketplace

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Listen to the show

Is Greenspan to blame?

Alan Greenspan in December 2005 (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Some pundits are pinning the blame for market uncertainty of late to former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, but is it fair to second guess 18 years of decision-making in hindsight? Besides, he did warn borrowers two years ago, John Dimsdale reports.

Listen to ThisStory
  • E-mail this to a friend
  • Print article

More on Economics, Wall Street

TEXT OF STORY

Scott Jagow: There's plenty of blame to go around for the recent market volatility. Some of the blame is being cast at the feet of former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan. Is that fair? John Dimsdale reports from Washington.


John Dimsdale: Even in retirement Alan Greenspan moves markets.

On the lecture circuit last fall, he said the worst of the housing slump was behind us, and investors kept buying. In February, he raised the specter of recession and the stock market hit a speed bump.

Today, some pundits say Greenspan's low interest rate policies earlier this decade created a housing bubble. But Carl Tannenbaum, chief economist at LaSalle Bank, says those low interest rates were designed to keep the struggling economy going.

Carl Tannenbaum: So it's hard to look back with perfect hindsight and re-gauge your decision that seemed like the right decision at the time.

Two years ago, the man who coined the phrase "irrational exuberance" did warn borrowers.

Alan Greenspan: History cautions that extended periods of low concern about credit risk have invariably been followed by reversal, with an attendant fall in the prices of risky assets.

Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, speaking in September of 2005

In Washington, I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.

Music From This Show

  • Daughter Pearl Jam Buy
  • The Arrivals Gate Ani DiFranco Buy
  • Beware of the Boys Panjabi MC Buy
  • In the Aeroplane Over the Sea Neutral Milk Hotel Buy

Marketplace Confessional

"Will makes a great argument. The hostile reception, as indicated by the comments, should be unsurprising. If people actually understood how much immigration has historically benefited us then we wouldn't have the type of protectionist immigration laws we have. If the borders were opened one might see a drop in wages, but considering there would be a correlative drop in prices, it's doubtful there would be an overall harm and most likely considerable benefit..."

The Specials

Conversations from the Corner Office

Marketplace goes one-on-one with CEOs, company founders, head honchos...

Sit in

Working

Intimate profiles of workers in the global economy.

Meet them

Consumer Consequences game

Find out what the world would look like if everyone lived like you. An interactive game from American Public Media.

Play

Marketplace on iTunes U

Marketplace is now available in iTunes U, Apple's online education platform. Get free, downloadable content in subjects like History, Science, Business and more. Study up

Sustainability

What is "sustainability?" It boils down to this: Don't eat your seed corn.

Learn more

 ©2008 American Public Media